NMEX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NMEX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-03-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +21 | −22 | ~3 | 9 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-15
Consulting – related party services were $18,000 and $18,000 for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. Fees are paid to Noel Schaefer, Director, but are recorded as consulting fees.
Professional fees were $25,285 and $35,746 for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $10,461 or 29.3%. Professional fees generally consist of legal and audit expenses. The decrease is due to a decrease in legal fees.
General and administrative expenses were $3,221 and $3,680 for the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $459 or 12.5%.
During the three months ended April 30, 2026 and 2025, we had total other expenses of $6,663 and $3,436, respectively. We had interest expense of $5,901 and we recognized an unrealized loss on the value of our Bitcoin asset of $762. In the prior period we had interest expense of $3,436. The increase…
For the three months ended April 30, 2026, we had a net loss of $58,993 as compared to a net loss of $68,062 for the three months ended April 30, 2025, a decrease to our net loss of $9,069 or 13.3%. The decrease is due to the reasons discussed above.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-03-17
Director compensation was $17,400 and $0 for the three months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, On January 7, 2026, the Company granted 100,000 shares of common stock to Berhane Tewolde, Director, for services. The shares were valued at $0.174, the closing price on the date of grant, fo…
Consulting – related party services were $18,000 and $19,400 for the three months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, a decrease of $1,400 or 7.2%. Fees are paid to Noel Schaefer, Director, but are recorded as consulting fees. In the prior period we also paid $1,250 to our former CEO.
Professional fees were $21,544 and $5,500 for the three months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $16,044 or 291.7%. Professional fees generally consist of legal and audit expenses. The increase is due to an increase in legal fees.
General and administrative expenses were $30,976 and $4,899 for the three months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, respectively, an increase of $26,077 or 532.3%. In the current period we issued shares of common stock for services valued at $17,300. We also spent $9,500 on website development expense…
During the three months ended January 31, 2026 and 2025, we had total other expenses of $7,728. We had interest expense of $4,571 and we recognized an unrealized loss on the value of our Bitcoin asset of $3,157. In the prior period we had interest expense of $2,936. The increase in interest expense …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice