NRP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of NRP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +35 | −21 | ~17 | 20 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Cash provided by operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2026 decreased $7.9 million as compared to the prior year period due primarily due to $7.8 million in distributions received from Sisecam Wyoming in 2025 and no distribution received from Sisecam Wyoming in 2026. Free cash fl…
The global soda ash market remains weak with international soda ash prices below the cost of production for many producers due to the increased natural soda ash supply from China, along with sluggish demand for flat glass due to slowing commercial and residential construction globally. We do not exp…
Revenues and other income related to our Soda Ash segment decreased $7.4 million as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to lower sales prices in 2026.
Total operating expenses, net increased $8.4 million primarily due to a $7.4 million increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense in addition to a $1.6 million increase in operating and maintenance expenses. The increase in depreciation, depletion and amortization expense was primari…
Net income decreased $9.0 million during the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to the decrease in revenues and other income within our Soda Ash segment and increase in total operating expenses as discussed above. These decreases were partially offse…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
Free cash flow ("FCF") represents net cash provided by (used in) operating activities plus distributions from unconsolidated investment in excess of cumulative earnings and return of long-term contract receivable; less maintenance and expansion capital expenditures, cash flow used in acquisition cos…
Cash provided by operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2026 decreased $3.0 million as compared to the prior year period due primarily due to the $2.9 million distribution received from Sisecam Wyoming in the first quarter of 2025 and no distribution received in the first quart…
The soda ash market remains significantly oversupplied due to the influx of natural soda ash supply from China coupled with weak demand for flat glass. We believe international soda ash prices are below the cost of production for most producers with no near-term market correction in sight. Due to th…
Total other revenues decreased $2.0 million primarily due to a $2.2 million decrease in production lease minimum revenues. This decrease was primarily driven by higher breakage revenues recognized in the first quarter of 2025.
Revenues and other income related to our Soda Ash segment decreased $12.4 million as compared to the prior year quarter primarily due to lower sales prices in 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice