ONMDW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ONMDW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +22 | −10 | ~15 | 22 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Total revenue increased by $0.1 million, or 88%, during the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.2 million increase in data delivery revenue as the Company continued its transition to a unified RWD platfor…
Cost of revenue was $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, representing an increase of $0.5 million, or 116%. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.4 million increase in software costs as we continue to exec…
General and administrative expenses were $1.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $0.2 million, or 17%. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.3 million decrease in professional fees, largely due …
Sales and marketing expenses were $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, an increase of $0.1 million, or 52%. The increase was primarily attributable to a $0.1 million increase in salaries and related personnel costs …
Research and development expenses were $0.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2025, a decrease of $0.1 million, or 15%. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $0.1 million decrease in contractor costs as certain devel…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Change in fair value of SEPA derivative liabilities (179) 324 145 -45%
Total revenue decreased by 30% or $0.04 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.06 million decrease in subscription revenue (BEAM) as a direct result of decommissioning this platform in May 2025, …
Cost of revenue was $0.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $0.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $0.1 million, or 32%. The increase of $0.1 million was primarily due to an increase in data and curation charges to support the increase in d…
General and administrative expenses were $1.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $1.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2025, an increase of $0.1 million, or 9%. The increase of $0.1 million was primarily due to an increase of $0.1 million in share-based compen…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice