OZ — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of OZ's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-04
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −18 | ~40 | 56 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 10 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-04
100 Tokeneke Road – Darien, Connecticut – On March 3, 2026, we, through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary BPOZ 100 Tokeneke Holding, LLC (“BPOZ Tokeneke”), made a loan (the “BPOZ Tokeneke Loan”) in the principal amount of $5.0 million, evidenced by a convertible promissory note (the “BPOZ Tokenek…
The BPOZ Tokeneke Loan bore interest at a rate of 3.6% per annum, computed on the basis of a 365/366-day year, and, unless earlier converted, was due and payable on March 3, 2028. The BPOZ Tokeneke Note was convertible, in whole or in part, in the sole discretion of BPOZ Tokeneke into that number of…
On October 22, 2026, with the written consent of BPOZ Tokeneke, Tokeneke Road prepaid the BPOZ Tokeneke Loan in full by paying BPOZ Tokeneke $5.1 million, consisting of the outstanding principal amount of $5.0 million and accrued interest of $0.1 million. The Related Party, funded the prepayment thr…
Commercial Segment Mixed-use Segment Total Commercial Segment Mixed-use Segment Total
During the three months ended September 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025, Commercial Segment NOI was relatively flat.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
As of the date of this Form 10-Q, our investment portfolio consisted of the following loans:
100 Tokeneke Road – Darien, Connecticut – On March 3, 2026, we, through our indirect wholly-owned subsidiary BPOZ 100 Tokeneke Holding, LLC (“BPOZ Tokeneke”), made a loan (the “BPOZ Tokeneke Loan”) in the principal amount of $5.0 million, evidenced by a convertible promissory note (the “BPOZ Tokenek…
The BPOZ Tokeneke Loan bears interest at a rate of 3.6% per annum, computed on the basis of a 365/366-day year, and, unless earlier converted, is due and payable on March 3, 2028. The BPOZ Tokeneke Note is convertible, in whole or in part, in the sole discretion of BPOZ Tokeneke into that number of …
During the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025, Commercial Segment NOI increased by $0.3 million, primarily due to lower real estate tax expenses and an increase in rental revenue.
During the three months ended June 30, 2026 as compared to the same period in 2025, Mixed-use Segment NOI increased by $2.1 million, primarily as a result of VIV, which was substantially completed on September 30, 2025 and therefore did not contribute NOI in the prior year period, as well as increas…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice