PAY — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PAY's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +15 | −8 | ~18 | 19 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-04
This shifting dynamic may create a compounding effect on our unit economics. Any corresponding increase in transaction volumes driven by partial payments could trigger a proportional rise in our interchange, network, and processing fees. Because these elevated costs of revenue may offset the potenti…
Beyond external economic pressures, our ability to scale efficiently depends on our capacity to quickly recruit, train and retain a high-performing workforce. We continue to offer competitive compensation and invest in employee well-being to attract and retain a high-performing workforce that enable…
The increase in free cash flow for the three months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was primarily driven by higher cash generated from operations, reflecting stronger operating performance and improved conversion of working capital into cash, partially offset by higher c…
The decrease in free cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, reflected increased investments in working capital and internal-use software development, which more than offset improved operating performance.
The increase in revenue was primarily driven by an increase in the number of transactions processed, which was driven by the implementation of new billers and increased transactions from our existing billers.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
However, this dynamic may create a compounding effect on our unit economics. Any such increase in transaction
volumes could trigger a proportional rise in our interchange, network, and processing fees. Because these elevated costs of revenue might offset the potential gains from higher transaction counts, this cycle could frequently yield flat net revenue growth. We may be unable to fully offset these inter…
Additionally, beyond these external economic pressures, our ability to scale efficiently depends on our capacity to quickly hire, train, and retain a high-performing workforce. We offer competitive wages and invest in employee well-being to meet our customers’ increasing needs and support our long-t…
The decrease in free cash flow for the three months ended March 31, 2026, as compared to the same period in 2025, was primarily driven by lower cash generated from operations, driven mainly by investment in working capital.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2026 and 2025
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
On March 11, 2026, Sanjay Kalra, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, adopted a trading arrangement for the sale of the Company’s Class A common stock that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c) (a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan”). Mr. Kalra’…
On March 12, 2026, TF Investment Holdings LLC ("TF Investment") adopted a Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan which expires May 31, 2027 and provides for the sale of up to 160,000 shares of common stock pursuant to the terms of the plan. Gary Trainor, one of the Company's directors, is the sole manager of TF I…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice