PFFLUBS AGvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of UBS AG against National Commercial Banks — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PFFL본 종목 | $27.0B#3 | — | 0.3x#1 | — | — | 132.6%#1 | — | 4.0%#8 | — | — | 15.2%#3 | 48.1%#1 |
| MER.PK | — | — | — | — | 6.8%#4 | 13.1%#9 | 98.2%#1 | 10.1%#4 | 16.3%#1 | — | — | — |
| MFG | $27.6B#2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 67.3%#1 | — |
| MLPB | $120.2B#1 | — | 1.4x#2 | — | — | 132.6%#1 | — | 4.0%#8 | — | — | 38.0%#2 | 10.8%#2 |
| PNFP.PA | — | — | — | — | — | 35.1%#3 | — | 4.3%#5 | 7.0%#2 | — | — | — |
| PNFP.PB | — | — | — | — | — | 35.1%#3 | — | 4.3%#5 | 7.0%#2 | — | — | — |
| PNFP.PC | — | — | — | — | — | 35.1%#3 | — | 4.3%#5 | 7.0%#2 | — | — | — |
| RF.PC | — | — | — | — | 23.8%#1 | 13.9%#6 | 51.0%#2 | 11.4%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| RF.PE | — | — | — | — | 23.8%#1 | 13.9%#6 | 51.0%#2 | 11.4%#1 | — | — | — | — |
| RF.PF | — | — | — | — | 23.8%#1 | 13.9%#6 | 51.0%#2 | 11.4%#1 | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 6021). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Table built 2026-09-22.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice