PHR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PHR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-09-03 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-28
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +68 | −45 | ~24 | 57 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~4 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +35 | −33 | ~39 | 222 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-03
•Net income was $4.9 million in the six months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to a net loss of $3.3 million in the six months ended July 31, 2025.
•Adjusted EBITDA was $63.4 million in the six months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to $42.9 million in the six months ended July 31, 2025.
•Net cash provided by operating activities was $18.3 million for the three months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to $14.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2025.
•Net cash provided by operating activities was $42.3 million for the six months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to $29.7 million for the six months ended July 31, 2025.
•Free cash flow was $13.8 million for the three months ended July 31, 2026, as compared to $9.6 million for the three months ended July 31, 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-28
•Net cash provided by operating activities was $23.9 million for the three months ended April 30, 2026, as compared to $14.9 million for the three months ended April 30, 2025.
•Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash as of April 30, 2026 was $76.4 million, an increase of $2.6 million as compared to January 31, 2026. As of April 30, 2026, cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash included $1.7 million of long-term restricted cash classified within other long-term asset…
On March 13, 2026 (the “Refinancing Date”), we and certain of our subsidiaries (collectively, the “Credit Parties”) entered into a Credit Agreement (the “New Capital One Credit Agreement”) providing for a senior secured revolving credit facility (the “New Capital One Credit Facility”) up to an aggre…
The New Capital One Credit Agreement bears interest at a rate per annum based on SOFR or a Base Rate as specified in the New Capital One Credit Agreement. Swingline loans must be Base Rate loans. We are permitted to repay the Credit Facility, in whole or in part, without penalty or premium, subject …
We will pay an unused line fee equal to the product of (i) a commitment fee percentage ranging from 0.25% to 0.40% per annum based on the applicable total net leverage ratio and (ii) the unused portion of the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-03
deteriorate. Due to inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-03
In addition, as we and the EHR and PM solutions with which we integrate, grow and expand product offerings, the EHR and PM solutions with which we integrate could offer more competitive services or make it more cost
prohibitive to do business with them. Some of these EHR and PM systems offer, or may begin to offer, services, including patient intake and engagement services, payment processing tools, patient financing options and direct patient communication services, in the same or similar manner as we do. Alth…
Additionally, our ability to maintain and grow our financing business is in part dependent on our access to capital to provide up-front cash to healthcare providers for eligible patient receivables, which could be obtained from multiple sources, including the securitization of cardholder receivables…
offer financing solutions with up-front funding to additional healthcare services clients. The existing Securitization Program imposes conditions and limitations on the receivables we are able to fund up-front, including aggregate concentration limits based on certain characteristics of the healthca…
business, or enforcement and other supervisory actions. Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that limitations of liability in our contracts are sufficient to protect us from liabilities, damages, or claims related to our privacy an…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-28
and would adversely affect our results of operations. Additionally, if we do not maintain our current client network, or if we have to renegotiate existing contracts on terms less favorable to us, our business, financial condition and results of operations may be harmed.
In addition, as we and the EHR and PM solutions with which we integrate, grow and expand product offerings, the EHR and PM solutions with which we integrate could offer more competitive services or make it more cost prohibitive to do business with them. Some of these EHR and PM systems offer, or may…
Regulation P and the FTC Safeguards Rule, as well as the FTC’s Identity Theft Red Flags Rule under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, which, among other things, require financial institutions to explain their information sharing practices to their customers, safeguard sensitive data and maintain an iden…
risks associated with foreign currency fluctuations, our financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected.
We typically enter into annual contracts for our software solutions with our healthcare services clients, which have a stated initial term of one year and automatically renew for one-year subsequent terms. For most of our software solutions, our clients have no obligation to renew their subscription…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-09-03
On July 13, 2026, Chaim Indig, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, adopted a trading arrangement for the sale of common stock (a “Rule 10b5-1 Trading Plan”) that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c). Mr. Indig’s Rule 10b5-1 Tradi…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-28
None of our directors or “officers,” as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or arrangement or a non-Rule 10b5-1 trading plan or arrangement, as defined in Item 408(c) of Regulation S-K, during the fiscal quarter covered…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice