PRCT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PRCT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-04-30 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +11 | −11 | ~19 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-30
The provision for income taxes consists primarily of foreign income taxes, as the Company does not have U.S. federal or state taxable income for the periods presented. As we expand the scale of our international business activities, any changes in the United States and foreign taxation of such activ…
Revenue increased $14.0 million, or 20%, to $83.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $69.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The growth in revenue was primarily attributable to $72.0 million in revenue derived from the United States for the three mo…
Cost of sales increased $4.2 million, or 17%, to $29.2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $25.0 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in cost of sales was primarily attributable to the growth in the number of units sold.
Gross margin increased to 65% during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to 64% for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in gross margin was primarily attributable to the growth in unit sales, which allowed us to spread the fixed portion of our manufacturing overhead costs…
R&D expenses increased $5.1 million, or 31%, to $21.5 million during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $16.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2025. The increase in R&D expenses was primarily due to employee-related expenses of our R&D organization such as salaries and…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-05
Three Months Ended September 30,Nine Months Ended September 30,
Comparison of Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 and 2024
Revenue increased $25.0 million, or 43%, to $83.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $58.4 million during the three months ended September 30, 2024, and increased $75.4 million, or 48%, to $231.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared to …
respectively. The increase was due to higher sales volumes of system sales, handpieces, other consumables, and service contracts.
Cost of sales increased $7.9 million, or 37%, to $29.3 million during the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to $21.5 million during the three months ended September 30, 2024, and increased $18.9 million, or 30%, to $81.8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, compared…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice