PTBS — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of PTBS's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2012-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2011-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +30 | −30 | ~12 | 4 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2012-05-15
The first quarter of 2012 has provided positive results with net income of $320 thousand, up almost 25% over the same period in 2011. The bank has produced two consecutive quarters of income despite the challenging economic environment. There has been significant positive movement in the unemploymen…
In addition to those items outside management control, the actions taken in the past year are creating improvement in economic performance. Interest expense as a result of decreases in deposit rates, are a significant reason for our ability to produce a profit. Management has aggressively marketed o…
Total assets have increased $10.9 million or 3.8% from the December 31, 2011 total of $287.4 million to $298.3 million at March 31, 2012. Net loans have decreased approximately $1.9 million from the December 31, 2011 total of $202.8 million to $200.9 million at March 31, 2012 due to the pay down of …
Total deposits have increased $11.9 million or 4.7% at March 31, 2012 compared to December 31, 2011. Interest-bearing deposits have increased 2.6% during the first quarter of 2012, with non-interest bearing deposits increasing 16.9%. Other liabilities have decreased approximately $2 million dollars.…
The Tier 1 capital to average assets ratio (leverage capital ratio) is 8.70% at March 31, 2012 compared to 8.56% at December 31, 2011. This capital ratio is within the regulatory guidelines for “well capitalized”.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2011-11-14
The quarter ended September 30, 2011 has produced little, if any, clarity to the economic outlook. The local economy has remained relatively unchanged. The housing market and unemployment continue to be a drag on the local economy. Management has counteracted the reductions in loan income by reducin…
Management continues to pursue potential loan relationships and is vigilantly marketing our current inventory of foreclosed properties. It is management’s opinion that one of the key elements to improving our situation and that of the local economy is to reduce this housing inventory currently owned…
The net loss for the quarter of $1.8 million and a net loss year to date of $1.3 million are primarily due to two charges posted in this quarter. First, we reduced the value of our foreclosed property assets by some $1.85 million upon obtaining updated appraisals on foreclosed property carried on ou…
A second charge of $2.1 million involves additions to our loan loss reserve as businesses and consumers continue to struggle because of the sluggish economy. In conjunction with our ongoing loan review process, an analysis of both primary and secondary sources of repayment including an assessment of…
Total assets have decreased $3.9 million or 1.3% from the December 31, 2010 total of $297.6 million to $293.7 million at September 30, 2011. Net loans have decreased approximately $12.1 million from the December 31, 2010 total of $214.2 million to $202.1 million at September 30, 2011 due to minimal …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice