RDNTvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of RDNT against SIC 8071 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| 기업 | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RDNT본 종목 | $4.9B#3 | — | 4.6x#3 | 2.4x#3 | 11.5%#5 | -768.5%#6 | 3.0%#2 | -1.7%#2 | 1.9%#2 | — | — | — |
| GRAL | $2.9B#4 | — | 1.2x#1 | 19.8x#5 | 17.2%#3 | 79.9%#1 | -382.0%#5 | -16.3%#4 | — | — | — | — |
| LH | $25.2B#2 | 27.2x#1 | 2.9x#2 | 1.8x#2 | 7.2%#6 | 17.6%#2 | 9.9%#1 | 10.0%#1 | 7.5%#1 | 7#1 | — | 1.0%#1 |
| NTRA | $37.7B#1 | — | 21.2x#5 | 16.3x#4 | 35.9%#1 | -9.3%#3 | -13.4%#3 | -11.7%#3 | -18.5%#3 | — | — | — |
| XGN | $107M#6 | — | 7.4x#4 | 1.6x#1 | 19.7%#2 | -32.0%#4 | -21.1%#4 | -138.2%#5 | -89.1%#4 | 3#2 | — | — |
| YDES | $155M#5 | — | — | 259.8x#6 | 16.9%#4 | -488.8%#5 | -883.3%#6 | — | — | — | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 8071). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. 이 표는 생성 중 시간이 초과되어 그룹의 일부만 포함합니다. 순위는 표시된 행 내에서만 유효하며 곧 채워집니다. Table built 2026-08-01.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice