RGR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RGR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-04 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-29
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −7 | ~44 | 24 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +2 | −5 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-04
● The generation of $24.2 million in cash from operations, as compared to $38.8 million over the same period last year. Impacted due to timing of third quarter 2026 shipments, and cash collections due to Oracle ERP system implementation in mid-third quarter 2026.
Inventory unit data for the trailing seven quarters follows:
The increase in total consolidated net sales and net firearms sales for the three months ended September 26, 2026 is attributable to increased demand, augmented by an increased average selling price.
The increased gross profit for the three months ended September 26, 2026 is attributable to the sales increases mentioned above. A major contributor was specific areas of cost control that centered around the realization of previously announced organizational realignment changes. Also contributing w…
The increase in total consolidated net sales and net firearms sales for the nine months ended September 26, 2026 is attributable to increased demand and stronger average selling price.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
· The generation of $36.1 million in cash from operations, versus $25.9 million over the same period last year.
The increase in total consolidated net sales and net firearms sales for the three months ended June 27, 2026 is attributable to increased demand, augmented by an increased average selling price. Sales of new products, including the RXM pistol, Marlin 1894 lever-action rifles, Glenfield rifles, Harri…
The increased gross profit for the three months ended June 27, 2026 is attributable to the aforementioned sales increases, the absence of inventory rationalization write-offs that were undertaken in the prior year, and the favorable leveraging of fixed costs resulting from increased production, augm…
The increase in total consolidated net sales and net firearms sales for the six months ended June 27, 2026 is attributable to increased demand, augmented by an increased average selling price. Sales of new products, including the RXM pistol, Super Wrangler revolver, Marlin lever-action rifles, and (…
Selling expenses for the six months ended June 27, 2026 were substantially comparable to the corresponding period in the prior year, with the increases in spending on industry shows and personnel costs offset by decreases in advertising, promotional and marketing initiatives, and shipping expenses.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-04
There were no contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase and sale of the Company’s securities, intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c) under the Exchange Act (“Rule 10b5-1 Plan”), adopted or terminated by the Company’s Section 16 officers or directors …
None of the Company’s directors or Section 16 officers adopted or terminated a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K during the three months ended September 26, 2026.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-29
The adoption or termination of contracts, instructions or written plans for the purchase and sale of the Company’s securities by the Company’s Section 16 officers or directors during the three months ended June 27, 2026, each of which is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule…
Michael W. Wilson (2) Vice President of Administration Adoption of Rule 10b5-1 Plan May 18, 2026 June 1, 2027 1,828
(1) John A. Cosentino, Jr., a director of the Company, entered into a Rule 10b5-1 Plan on May 27, 2026. Mr. Cosentino’s Rule 10b5-1 Plan provides for the potential purchase of up to 20,000 shares and/or sale of up to 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Rule 10b5-1 Plan expires on May 27…
(2) Michael W. Wilson, an officer of the Company, entered into a Rule 10b5-1 Plan on May 18, 2026. Mr. Wilson’s Rule 10b5-1 Plan provides for the potential sale of up to 1,828 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Rule 10b5-1 Plan expires on June 1, 2027, or upon the earlier completion of all au…
None of the Company’s directors or Section 16 officers adopted or terminated a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K during the three months ended June 27, 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice