RMCO — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RMCO's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −5 | ~2 | 4 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 3 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
Our total cost of revenues for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, were $1,678,936 and $3,106,384, respectively and $1,101,994 and $1,767,209, respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025. The primary driver in this increase is the result of the new business contract with …
Our total operating expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, were $243,502 and $539,017, respectively and $273,334 and $642,554, respectively for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025. The decrease was due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses in both three an…
Total other income and expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, were other income of $465,844 and other expenses of $1,381, respectively. Total other expenses and income for the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, were other expenses of $99,706 and other income of $51,075, re…
Total net income (loss) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, were net income of $375,220 and net loss of $277,138, respectively. Total net loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, were $49,528 and $108,283, respectively.
The Company’s primary use of positive cash flow has been to fund corporate holding and public company costs. As of June 30, 2026, the Company has positive working capital of $646,236, a cash balance of $275,916 and positive total cash flow of $124,052. Despite recurring losses, management believes t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our total cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, were $1,427,448 and $669,900, respectively. The increase is due to increased volume for our environmental services subsidiary. The significant increase in expense is also due to the new contract services agreement signed …
Total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, were $295,514 and $364,534, respectively. The decrease was due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses.
Total other income and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, $565,550 of other expenses and $52,456 of other income, respectively. The primary reasons for the decrease were due to a large loss on warrant fair value adjustment.
The Company’s primary use of positive cash flow has been to fund corporate holding and public company costs. As of March 31, 2026, the Company has positive working capital of $459,982, a cash balance of $343,949 and positive total cash flow of $210,885. Despite recurring losses, management believes …
We paid dividends totaling $37,852 on January 10, 2026 ($0.0025 per share) for the Company’s fourth quarter 2025 dividend payment (for the three months ended December 31, 2025). On January 30, 2025, our Board of Directors authorized the Company to pay a $0.01 per share dividend for the next four cal…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice