RMCOW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of RMCOW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −7 | ~2 | 3 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +8 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Our total operating revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, were $1,636,154 and $923,223, respectively. The increase is due to increased volume for our environmental services subsidiary. There was a new contract services agreement signed by RMC Environmental Services effective F…
Our total cost of revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, were $1,427,448 and $669,900, respectively. The increase is due to increased volume for our environmental services subsidiary. The significant increase in expense is also due to the new contract services agreement signed …
Total operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, were $295,514 and $364,534, respectively. The decrease was due to a decrease in general and administrative expenses.
Total other income and expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, $565,550 of other expenses and $52,456 of other income, respectively. The primary reasons for the decrease were due to a large loss on warrant fair value adjustment.
The Company’s primary use of positive cash flow has been to fund corporate holding and public company costs. As of March 31, 2026, the Company has positive working capital of $459,982, a cash balance of $343,949 and positive total cash flow of $210,885. Despite recurring losses, management believes …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Our total operating revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, were $1,302,815 and $3,553,219, respectively, and $145,632 and $561,956, respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. Our revenues are derived from income received from our various investment…
Our total cost of revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, were $1,156,678 and $2,923,888, respectively and $5,460 and $21,532, respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. The primary driver in this increase is the result of the new business contract …
Our total operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, were $244,507 and $887,060, respectively and $309,644 and $830,996, respectively for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024. There was a decrease to total operating expenses during the three months ended…
Total other expenses and income for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, were other expenses of $110,725 and other income of $50,315, respectively. Total other expenses and income for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, were other expenses of $59,650 and other income of…
Total net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025, were $209,095 and $317,378, respectively. Total net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2024, were $119,156 and $83,160, respectively.
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Investments in our securities involve substantial risk. The occurrence of one or more of the events or circumstances described in the section of this report entitled “Risk Factors,” alone or in combination with other events or circumstances, may have a material adverse effect on our business, cash f…
RMHC has a relatively short operating history, which makes it difficult to evaluate the business and future prospects difficult and may increase the risk of your investment.
Since its inception, all of RMHC’s revenues come from three sources. The loss of any one of these could results in a material adverse effect on RMHC.
As a company with portfolio holdings in the mining industry, we face many particular and evolving risks associated with that industry.
Our long-term results of operations are difficult to predict and depend on the continued growth of current and future royalty streams.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
Because we are an Emerging Growth Company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice