SLNHP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of SLNHP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +126 | −179 | ~27 | 19 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +9 | −9 | ~1 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3)
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We develop, own, and operate digital infrastructure for energy-intensive computing applications by colocating data centers with renewable energy power plants. We refer to this model as Renewable Computing™.
Renewable Computing™ is designed to address two converging market conditions: increasing curtailment of renewable energy generation and growing demand for power-intensive computing applications, including artificial intelligence (“AI”), high-performance computing (“HPC”), and Bitcoin mining. By loca…
We utilize two distinct data center designs to serve different computing markets. For our Bitcoin mining and hosting business, we deploy a data center design optimized for flexible, large-scale digital asset operations. For AI and HPC workloads, we are developing an AI-ready data center design inten…
Our facilities are managed by MaestroOS™ (“MaestroOS”), our proprietary software platform, which analyzes factors such as local power pricing, weather conditions, grid demand, and market signals to optimize operating performance and power consumption across our operating assets.
Our business model is intended to enhance the monetization of renewable generation assets while supporting scalable digital infrastructure growth. We work with renewable energy developers and power partners to access low-cost or otherwise constrained energy resources. Our data centers operate on a b…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
We develop and operate digital infrastructure that taps into a growing global opportunity: the convergence of renewable energy and High-Performance Computing (HPC). We call this model Renewable Computing™.
Across the world, vast amounts of clean energy go to waste due to curtailment. At the same time, there is a critical shortage of power for energy-intensive infrastructure like AI, HPC, and Bitcoin mining. Renewable Computing™ bridges this gap—unlocking stranded renewable energy and turning it into s…
We build, own or co-own, and operate data centers co-located with wind, solar, and hydroelectric plants. Our modular and scalable design supports high-throughput, batchable applications such as Bitcoin, and soon, HPC/AI workloads. These facilities are managed by MaestroOS™, our proprietary operating…
This intelligent orchestration enables long-term asset monetization and attractive returns on invested capital. Our approach is purpose-built for the energy transition. We specialize in curtailment solutions, working closely with leading renewable energy developers to access underutilized, low-cost …
A key strategic advantage is our model of co-locating data centers directly with renewable power generation assets. By building behind the meter, we are able to bypass long interconnection queues and source electricity directly from the generation site. This structure not only improves power economi…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Exchange Act, and the rules and regulations thereunder, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules a…
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such te…
Material Weakness in Internal Control and Plan for Remediation
As disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2025, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that remained open as of March 31, 2026 related to control activities over balance sheet classification and presentation. Sp…
Our Board of Directors and management take internal control over financial reporting and the integrity of our financial statements seriously. Management continues to work to improve its controls related to our material weaknesses. The remediation actions include: (i) enhancing design and documentati…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
The certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officers are attached as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q include, in paragraph 4 of such certification, information concerning our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial…
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2025. The term “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the …
●The Company did not maintain effective control over the accurate calculation of both basic and diluted EPS. Specifically, controls failed to ensure the correct treatment of complex equity instruments, as evidenced by an error identified in the financial statements concerning the calculation of earn…
● During the quarter ended September 30, 2025, the Company processed the exercise of liability-classified warrants. Due to complexity surrounding the accounting for the derivative liability settlement and the subsequent fair value assessment, an additional material adjustment was required. This adju…
Notwithstanding the existence of this material weakness, management has concluded that the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2025 are fairly stated in all material respects in accordance with genera…
Legal proceedings
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-14
On December 29, 2022, NYDIG filed a complaint against the Soluna Parties in the Court regarding the NYDIG Loans made by NYDIG to Borrower pursuant to a Master Equipment Finance Agreement, dated December 30, 2021, that were secured by certain assets of Borrower and guaranteed by Guarantor pursuant to…
On September 29, 2025, the Soluna Parties and NYDIG entered into a Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”), pursuant to which the Soluna Parties and NYDIG agreed to fully settle and resolve the Agreed Judgment Amount and all other matters relating to the NYDIG Loans in exchange for the Sol…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice