STAI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of STAI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2025-12-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-09-17
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −24 | ~23 | 17 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +4 | −1 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Risk factors | Some risk factors updated | +5 | −3 | ~3 | 9 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −2 | ~1 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
SENTINEL’s fix-gantry CT architecture incorporates four discrete pairs of fixed multi-energy X-ray generators and detector arrays. Each generator/ detector pair is optimally configured to provide non- traditional planar slices significantly expanding the robustness, reliability and repeatability of …
to Entrance. The three slices of metadata are used to reconstruct a three- dimensional map of the effective atomic numbers (Zeff) and mass densities of the scanned contents. The projections in this innovative geometry provide three unique planes while the projections of conventional CT systems are e…
four bolts plus two connectors. Simply remove and replace the unit with a new X-ray monoblock and the system is ready to scan. No alignment of the X-ray monoblock is required because of the pre-aligned precision of the X-ray generator and detector array mounting frames, so an X-ray monoblock change …
Operating expenses primarily consist of general and administrative costs, including payroll, as well as research and development expenses. As of September 30, 2025, general and administrative expenses represented the largest component of our operating expenses. These costs have increased significant…
For the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, operating expenses were $5.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, an increase of 229% during the period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, operating expenses were $21.9 million and $3.9 million, respectively, an increase…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-09-17
SENTINEL’s fix-gantry CT architecture incorporates four discrete pairs of fixed multi-energy X-ray generators and detector arrays. Each generator/ detector pair is optimally configured to provide non- traditional planar slices significantly expanding the robustness, reliability and repeatability of …
Operating expenses primarily consist of general and administrative costs, including payroll, as well as research and development expenses. As of June 30, 2025, and December 31, 2024, general and administrative expenses represented the largest
component of our operating expenses. These costs have increased significantly over the past 12 months, primarily due to expenses associated with capital markets activities related to the Business Combination.
For the three ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, operating expenses were $3.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively, an increase of 43% during the period. For the six ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, operating expenses were $9.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, an increase of 112% during the period.
Research and development expenses consist primarily of engineering and regulatory activities.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
reconciliations including inventory, preparation of tax provision, and journal entries, and; 5) a material weakness related to the IT environment including controls over cybersecurity, logical, network, and physical security, data backup and recovery, change management and vendor management, includi…
In addition, the restatement of our condensed consolidated financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2025 identified a further material weakness related to ineffective controls over the identification, recording, classification, and presentation of various transactions, including share-…
As of the end of the reporting period, none of these material weaknesses had been fully remediated. Accordingly, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective.
There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the nine months ended September 30, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control ove…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-09-17
There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the six months ended June 30, 2025, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over fina…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
with Nasdaq rules, the Company has a period of 180 calendar days (or until January 26, 2026) to regain compliance with the MVPHS Requirement. To regain compliance during this 180-day compliance period, the minimum MVPHS must close at $15 million or more for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days.…
On November 5, 2025, the Staff notified the Company that compliance with MVPHS has been regained and the matter is now closed
The Company has requested a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel and paid the associated fee. Because the Notice cites non-compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) as an additional basis for the Staff determination, the Company has received an automatic 15-day stay of suspension under Nasd…
In the event that the Company does not regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement, or Bid Price Requirement, prior to the expiration of each respective 180-day compliance period, the Company will receive written notification from Nasdaq that the Company’s securities are subject to delisting. Altern…
If we fail to regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement, or Bid Price Requirement, or for any other reason, Nasdaq delists our common stock from trading on its exchange and we are unable to obtain listing on another national securities exchange or take action to restore our compliance with the Nas…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-09-17
for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days. The MVPHS Notice has no immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s common stock on The Nasdaq Global Market.
In the event that the Company does not regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement, Bid Price Requirement, or MVPHS Requirement prior to the expiration of each respective 180-day compliance period, the Company will receive written notification from Nasdaq that the Company’s securities are subject to…
If we fail to regain compliance with the MVLS Requirement, Bid Price Requirement, or MVPHS Requirement, or for any other reason, Nasdaq delists our Common Stock from trading on its exchange and we are unable to obtain listing on another national securities exchange or take action to restore our comp…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-15
During the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2025, none of our executive officers or directors (as defined in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), adopted, terminated, or modified a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as each of t…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-09-17
and other assertions in the Default Notice, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations.
During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2025, none of our executive officers or directors (as defined in Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended), adopted, terminated, or modified a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as each of those …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice