TRGP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of TRGP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-06 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +25 | −7 | ~27 | 115 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~9 | 9 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
In July 2026, the Partnership amended the accounts receivable securitization facility (the “Securitization Facility”) to, among other things, extend the facility termination date to July 30, 2027. Additionally, the total capacity of the Securitization Facility increased from up to $600 million to up…
Litigation and environmental reserves includes charges related to specific litigation and environmental compliance matters that are nonrecurring in nature and outside the ordinary course of our business and/or not reflective of our ongoing core operations. We may incur such charges from time to time…
Commodity sales were relatively flat due to lower natural gas prices ($784.8 million) and the unfavorable impact of hedges ($291.6 million), partially offset by higher NGL and condensate prices ($597.8 million) and higher NGL, natural gas and condensate volumes ($435.2 million).
The increase in other operating (income) expense was primarily due to lower asset abandonment costs.
The increase in income tax (expense) benefit was primarily due to the increase in pre-tax book income.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
On July 4, 2025, President Trump signed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (the “OBBBA”) into law. Among other things, the OBBBA indefinitely extends the 100% first-year depreciation allowance on qualified property placed in service after January 19, 2025, includes favorable modifications to the busines…
The U.S. Department of the Treasury and the IRS have issued guidance on the application of the corporate alternative minimum tax (the “CAMT”), which is a 15% minimum tax imposed on certain financial income of “applicable corporations,” including proposed regulations issued in September 2024, which m…
The decrease in commodity sales reflected lower NGL, natural gas and condensate prices ($1,064.2 million), partially offset by higher NGL, natural gas and condensate volumes ($476.9 million) and the favorable impact of hedges ($47.5 million).
The increase in operating expenses was due to higher repairs and maintenance and higher compensation and benefits.
In July 2025, the Partnership amended the Securitization Facility to, among other things, extend the facility termination date to August 31, 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice