VCYT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of VCYT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-31 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +18 | −14 | ~23 | 36 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +5 | −3 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
We serve global markets with two complementary models. In the United States, we offer laboratory developed tests, or LDTs, through our centralized CLIA certified laboratories in South San Francisco and San Diego, California, supported by our cytopathology lab in Austin, Texas. Additionally, outside …
We believe our broad menu of advanced diagnostic tests, combined with our ability to deliver them globally, differentiates us in the diagnostics industry.
Revenue increased $20.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. This was primarily due to a $23.4 million increase in testing revenue, partially offset by a $3.5 million decrease in our biopharmaceutical and other revenue. The 19% growth in testing reven…
Revenue increased $44.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. This was primarily due to a $51.2 million increase in testing revenue partially offset by a $6.8 million decrease in our biopharmaceutical and other revenue. The 22% growth in testing revenue …
Product revenue increased $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
In the United States, we currently offer tests in prostate cancer (Decipher Prostate), thyroid cancer (Afirma), breast cancer (Prosigna) and bladder cancer (Decipher Bladder). In addition, we are planning to offer our Prosigna test for breast cancer as an LDT in 2026.
We serve global markets with two complementary models. In the United States, we offer LDTs through our centralized CLIA certified laboratories in South San Francisco and San Diego, California, supported by our cytopathology expertise in Austin, Texas. Additionally, outside of the United States, we p…
Intangible asset amortization - cost of revenue2,707 2,585 122 5%
Intangible asset amortization - operating expenses579 622 (43)(7)%
Revenue increased $24.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the same period in 2025. This was primarily due to a $27.8 million increase in testing revenue partially offset by a $3.3 million decrease in our biopharmaceutical and other revenue. The 26% growth in testing reven…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-31
During the three months ended June 30, 2026, the following Section 16 officers and directors adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act). None of our other officers or directors adopted, modified or terminated suc…
•Karin Eastham, Director, adopted a new trading plan on May 28, 2026 (with the first trade under the new plan scheduled for approximately August 27, 2026). The trading plan will be effective until May 7, 2027 to sell an aggregate of 23,841 shares of our common stock.
•Muna Bhanji, Director, adopted a new trading plan on June 2, 2026 (with the first trade under the new plan scheduled for approximately September 1, 2026). The trading plan will be effective until August 31, 2027 to sell an aggregate of 3,728 shares of our common stock.
•John Leite, Global Chief Commercial Officer, adopted a new trading plan on June 9, 2026 (with the first trade under the new plan scheduled for approximately September 8, 2026). The trading plan will be effective until August 13, 2027 to sell 100% of the net shares resulting from the vesting of 44,2…
•Jens Holstein, Director, adopted a new trading plan on June 12, 2026 (with the first trade under the new plan scheduled for approximately September 11, 2026). The trading plan will be effective until June 7, 2027 to sell an aggregate of 20,000 shares of our common stock.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06
The Board of Directors of the Company amended and restated the Company’s amended and restated bylaws (as so amended and restated, the “Bylaws”), effective May 1, 2026. The amendments implement a cure process for certain deficiencies in director nomination notices submitted by stockholders. For nomin…
This description of the amendments to the Bylaws is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the text of the Bylaws filed as Exhibit 3.2 to this report.
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of our officers and directors adopted, modified or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K of the Exchange Act).
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice