YHNAU — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of YHNAU's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +9 | −3 | ~11 | 34 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On June 10, 2026, we received a notification letter (the “Notification Letter on Minimum Total Holders”) from Nasdaq that the Company is not in compliance with the minimum total holders requirement set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5450(a)(2) for continued listing on Nasdaq, which requires a minimum …
The Notification Letter provides that the Company has 45 calendar days to submit a plan to regain compliance. If our plan is accepted, Nasdaq can grant an extension of up to 180 calendar days from the date of the Notification Letter to evidence compliance. In determining whether to accept our plan, …
Alternatively, the Company may consider applying for a transfer of listing to The Nasdaq Capital Market (the “Capital Market”). In order to transfer, the Company must submit an online transfer application, pay the $5,000 application fee, and meet the Capital Market’s continued listing requirements.
The Company intends to monitor the number of its Total Holders and will consider implementing available options to regain compliance with the Minimum Total Holders Requirement.
For the three months ended June 30, 2026, we had a net income of $114,872 which was comprised of formation and operating costs expenses, dividend income and interest income.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
As of March 31, 2026, we had cash of $22,788. Until the consummation of the initial public offering, the only source of liquidity was an initial purchase of ordinary shares by our Sponsor, monies loaned by the Sponsor under a certain unsecured promissory note and advances from our Sponsor.
Subsequent remeasurement of ordinary shares subject to possible redemption - 2024 789,076
Ordinary shares subject to possible redemption as of December 31, 2024 61,089,076
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
The Company is not party to any legal proceedings as of the filing date of this Form 10-Q.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice