Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

ABBV vs MRK

ABBV and MRK side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

ABBV vs MRK key statistics
MetricABBVAbbVie Inc.MRKMerck & Co., Inc.
Market cap$520.97B$368.94B
P/E (TTM)83.3119.6
P/B—8.80
P/S8.5x5.7x
Dividend yield2.24%2.22%
Revenue$61.16B(TTM)$66.57B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)8.6%1.3%
Net income$6.31B(TTM)$3.17B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)-1.2%6.6%
EPS, diluted$3.54(TTM)$1.25(TTM)
EBIT margin24.6%34.2%
ROE—43.5%
ROIC18.6%21.6%
1y total return+32.0%+77.1%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: ABBV vs MRK

$10.0K$73.0K$35.8K2016-06-292026-10-30
MetricABBVMRK
End value$73.0K$35.8K
Total return+629.9%+258.2%
CAGR+21.2%+13.1%
Volatility25.8%23.4%
Sharpe0.720.47
Sortino1.000.69
Max drawdown-45.1%-43.4%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-06-29 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

PFE vs MRKABBV vs JNJLLY vs MRKABBV vs LLYMRK vs NVOABBV vs PFE

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)