Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

ASML vs LRCX

ASML and LRCX side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

ASML vs LRCX key statistics
MetricASMLASML HOLDING NVLRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
Market cap$603.95B$298.75B
P/E (TTM)—35.6
P/B—21.48
P/S—12.9x
Dividend yield—0.43%
Revenue—$26.13B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)—26.0%
Net income—$8.45B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)—35.6%
EPS, diluted—$6.71(TTM)
EBIT margin—35.3%
ROE—52.2%
ROIC—65.4%
Piotroski F—8/9
1y total return+45.7%+49.1%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: ASML vs LRCX

$10.0K$176.7K$333.4K2016-06-292026-10-30
MetricASMLLRCX
End value$176.7K$333.4K
Total return+1666.8%+3234.4%
CAGR+32.0%+40.4%
Volatility39.0%46.4%
Sharpe0.800.88
Sortino1.161.30
Max drawdown-56.9%-56.4%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-06-29 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AMAT vs LRCXASML vs TSMASML vs NVDAAMAT vs ASMLKLAC vs LRCXASML vs KLAC

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)