Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

CMCSA vs META

CMCSA and META side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

CMCSA vs META key statistics
MetricCMCSACOMCAST CORPORATIONMETAMeta Platforms, Inc.
Market cap—$1.47T
P/E (TTM)8.721.8
P/B—5.61
P/S—7.3x
Dividend yield—0.36%
Revenue$124.90B(TTM)$228.25B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)-0.0%22.2%
Net income$11.20B(TTM)$68.10B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)23.5%-3.1%
EPS, diluted$3.12(TTM)$26.55(TTM)
EBIT margin16.7%41.4%
ROE22.3%23.1%
ROIC17.9%17.8%
1y total return-19.4%-22.8%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: CMCSA vs META

$10.0K$12.3K$53.6K2016-04-272026-08-28
MetricCMCSAMETA
End value$12.3K$53.6K
Total return+22.8%+435.5%
CAGR+2.0%+17.6%
Volatility26.5%38.7%
Sharpe0.060.52
Sortino0.080.74
Max drawdown-55.4%-76.7%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-04-27 → 2026-08-28 · risk-free 3.9% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

GOOGL vs METAMETA vs NFLXDIS vs CMCSAAAPL vs METAAMZN vs METAMETA vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)