Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

GEV vs VRT

GEV and VRT side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

GEV vs VRT key statistics
MetricGEVGE Vernova Inc.VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Market cap$226.97B$89.54B
P/E (TTM)22.543.5
P/B19.9416.27
P/S6.0x8.8x
Dividend yield0.12%0.07%
Revenue$44.04B(TTM)$13.12B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)9.0%27.7%
Net income$10.37B(TTM)$2.10B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)214.7%168.8%
EPS, diluted$38.09(TTM)$5.35(TTM)
EBIT margin3.6%17.9%
ROE42.9%24.2%
ROIC—28.4%
1y total return+49.5%+20.1%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: GEV vs VRT

$10.0K$61.6K$28.9K2024-04-022026-10-30
MetricGEVVRT
End value$61.6K$28.9K
Total return+515.7%+188.7%
CAGR+102.5%+50.9%
Volatility53.3%66.6%
Sharpe1.520.90
Sortino2.291.27
Max drawdown-38.3%-61.3%

Based on 649 common trading days, 2024-04-02 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGLMSFT vs GOOGLMETA vs NFLXORCL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)