Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

GEV vs VRT

GEV and VRT side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

GEV vs VRT key statistics
MetricGEVGE Vernova Inc.VRTVertiv Holdings Co
Market cap$235.02B$90.35B
P/E (TTM)25.353.1
P/B19.6618.99
P/S6.2x8.8x
Dividend yield0.12%0.07%
Revenue$41.37B(TTM)$11.48B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)9.0%27.7%
Net income$9.53B(TTM)$1.73B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)214.7%168.8%
EPS, diluted$34.88(TTM)$4.42(TTM)
EBIT margin3.6%17.9%
ROE40.8%28.0%
ROIC—28.5%
1y total return+40.6%+69.8%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: GEV vs VRT

$10.0K$63.3K$29.1K2024-04-022026-09-15
MetricGEVVRT
End value$63.3K$29.1K
Total return+533.3%+191.3%
CAGR+112.2%+54.6%
Volatility53.5%66.7%
Sharpe1.610.94
Sortino2.451.32
Max drawdown-38.3%-61.3%

Based on 616 common trading days, 2024-04-02 → 2026-09-15 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGLMSFT vs GOOGLMETA vs NFLXORCL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)