Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

KLAC vs ASML

KLAC and ASML side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

KLAC vs ASML key statistics
MetricKLACKLA CORPASMLASML HOLDING NV
Market cap$220.92B$607.11B
P/E (TTM)46.2—
P/B34.79—
P/S16.3x—
Dividend yield0.48%—
Revenue$13.58B(TTM)—
Revenue growth (YoY)11.7%—
Net income$4.83B(TTM)—
Earnings growth (YoY)18.9%—
EPS, diluted$3.66(TTM)—
EBIT margin5.7%—
ROE76.1%—
ROIC7.5%—
1y total return+76.1%+93.5%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: KLAC vs ASML

$10.0K$288.5K$184.3K2016-05-112026-09-14
MetricKLACASML
End value$288.5K$184.3K
Total return+2784.5%+1742.9%
CAGR+38.4%+32.5%
Volatility42.9%39.0%
Sharpe0.880.82
Sortino1.281.18
Max drawdown-43.9%-56.9%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-05-11 → 2026-09-14 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

ASML vs TSMASML vs NVDAAMAT vs ASMLAMAT vs KLACKLAC vs LRCXASML vs KLAC

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)