Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

KRMN vs LUNR

KRMN and LUNR side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

KRMN vs LUNR key statistics
MetricKRMNKARMAN HOLDINGS INC.LUNRINTUITIVE MACHINES, INC.
Market cap$4.97B—
P/E (TTM)138.8—
P/B11.79—
P/S10.5x—
Revenue$589.55M(TTM)$481.34M(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)36.6%-9.2%
Net income$37.18M(TTM)-$130.55M(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)36.7%70.6%
EPS, diluted$0.27(TTM)$-0.94(TTM)
EBIT margin15.5%-42.1%
ROE4.1%—
ROIC10.4%—
1y total return-41.2%+53.4%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: KRMN vs LUNR

$10.0K$12.5K$7.2K2025-02-132026-09-15
MetricKRMNLUNR
End value$12.5K$7.2K
Total return+24.7%-27.6%
CAGR+14.9%-18.4%
Volatility69.2%110.5%
Sharpe0.490.32
Sortino0.700.49
Max drawdown-70.2%-75.1%

Based on 398 common trading days, 2025-02-13 → 2026-09-15 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGLMSFT vs GOOGLMETA vs NFLXORCL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)