Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

LRCX vs ASML

LRCX and ASML side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

LRCX vs ASML key statistics
MetricLRCXLAM RESEARCH CORPORATIONASMLASML HOLDING NV
Market cap$298.75B$603.95B
P/E (TTM)35.6—
P/B21.48—
P/S12.9x—
Dividend yield0.43%—
Revenue$26.13B(TTM)—
Revenue growth (YoY)26.0%—
Net income$8.45B(TTM)—
Earnings growth (YoY)35.6%—
EPS, diluted$6.71(TTM)—
EBIT margin35.3%—
ROE52.2%—
ROIC65.4%—
Piotroski F8/9—
1y total return+49.1%+45.7%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: LRCX vs ASML

$10.0K$333.4K$176.7K2016-06-292026-10-30
MetricLRCXASML
End value$333.4K$176.7K
Total return+3234.4%+1666.8%
CAGR+40.4%+32.0%
Volatility46.4%39.0%
Sharpe0.880.80
Sortino1.301.16
Max drawdown-56.4%-56.9%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-06-29 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AMAT vs LRCXASML vs TSMASML vs NVDAAMAT vs ASMLKLAC vs LRCXASML vs KLAC

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)