Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

LUNR vs KRMN

LUNR and KRMN side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

LUNR vs KRMN key statistics
MetricLUNRINTUITIVE MACHINES, INC.KRMNKARMAN HOLDINGS INC.
Market cap—$4.97B
P/E (TTM)—138.8
P/B—11.79
P/S—10.5x
Revenue$481.34M(TTM)$589.55M(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)-9.2%36.6%
Net income-$130.55M(TTM)$37.18M(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)70.6%36.7%
EPS, diluted$-0.94(TTM)$0.27(TTM)
EBIT margin-42.1%15.5%
ROE—4.1%
ROIC—10.4%
1y total return+53.4%-41.2%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: LUNR vs KRMN

$10.0K$7.2K$12.5K2025-02-132026-09-15
MetricLUNRKRMN
End value$7.2K$12.5K
Total return-27.6%+24.7%
CAGR-18.4%+14.9%
Volatility110.5%69.2%
Sharpe0.320.49
Sortino0.490.70
Max drawdown-75.1%-70.2%

Based on 398 common trading days, 2025-02-13 → 2026-09-15 · risk-free 4.11% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGLMSFT vs GOOGLMETA vs NFLXORCL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)