Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsHotNewsAI Chat
What's new
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

MS vs JPM

MS and JPM side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

MS vs JPM key statistics
MetricMSMORGAN STANLEYJPMJPMORGAN CHASE & CO
Market cap$332.11B$942.81B
P/E (TTM)19.116.8
P/B2.912.59
P/S9.7x5.2x
Dividend yield1.99%1.76%
Revenue$36.32B(TTM)$182.45B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)5.5%2.8%
Net income$18.11B(TTM)$58.85B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)25.9%-2.6%
EPS, diluted$11.04(TTM)$20.89(TTM)
EBIT margin186.3%84.3%
ROE14.8%15.7%
ROIC14.4%28.6%
1y total return+51.5%+21.7%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: MS vs JPM

$10.0K$112.6K$77.8K2016-03-302026-07-31
MetricMSJPM
End value$112.6K$77.8K
Total return+1025.8%+678.0%
CAGR+26.4%+22.0%
Volatility31.5%27.2%
Sharpe0.780.73
Sortino1.151.07
Max drawdown-51.3%-43.6%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-03-30 → 2026-07-31 · risk-free 3.83% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

JPM vs BACGS vs MSJPM vs WFCC vs JPMGS vs JPMJPM vs MS

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)