Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

NTLA vs VRTX

NTLA and VRTX side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

NTLA vs VRTX key statistics
MetricNTLAINTELLIA THERAPEUTICS, INC.VRTXVERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INC / MA
Market cap$1.72B$139.22B
P/E (TTM)—35.3
P/B—6.66
P/S25.5x11.6x
Revenue—$12.95B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)16.9%8.9%
Net income—$3.98B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)20.5%838.1%
EPS, diluted—$15.54(TTM)
EBIT margin-651.7%34.8%
ROE-56.7%18.9%
ROIC—17.4%
1y total return+1.0%+30.3%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: NTLA vs VRTX

$10.0K$6.2K$63.5K2016-07-052026-11-04
MetricNTLAVRTX
End value$6.2K$63.5K
Total return-38.0%+534.6%
CAGR-4.5%+19.6%
Volatility78.3%32.6%
Sharpe0.280.58
Sortino0.410.86
Max drawdown-96.5%-41.6%

Based on 2600 common trading days, 2016-07-05 → 2026-11-04 · risk-free 4.21% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AMGN vs VRTXREGN vs VRTXGILD vs VRTXAAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGL

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)