Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

PANW vs ZS

PANW and ZS side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

PANW vs ZS key statistics
MetricPANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc.ZSZscaler Inc
Market cap$299.37B$38.79B
P/B10.8914.93
P/S26.1x11.6x
Revenue$11.48B(TTM)$3.35B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)24.5%25.4%
Net income$306.60M(TTM)-$63.18M(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)-73.0%-52.3%
EPS, diluted$0.40(TTM)$-0.39(TTM)
EBIT margin6.1%-4.0%
ROE1.1%-2.4%
ROIC1.5%-4.7%
Piotroski F4/94/9
1y total return+67.6%-26.1%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: PANW vs ZS

$10.0K$117.1K$72.1K2018-03-162026-10-30
MetricPANWZS
End value$117.1K$72.1K
Total return+1071.2%+620.7%
CAGR+33.0%+25.7%
Volatility40.3%58.5%
Sharpe0.810.61
Sortino1.170.89
Max drawdown-48.0%-76.4%

Based on 2169 common trading days, 2018-03-16 → 2026-10-30 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

CRWD vs PANWCRWD vs ZSS vs ZSFTNT vs PANWFTNT vs ZSNET vs ZS

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)