Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

RIVN vs TSLA

RIVN and TSLA side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

RIVN vs TSLA key statistics
MetricRIVNRivian Automotive, Inc. / DETSLATesla, Inc.
Market cap$19.40B$1.57T
P/E (TTM)—437.6
P/B3.2917.63
P/S3.6x16.6x
Revenue$6.48B(TTM)$103.57B(TTM)
Revenue growth (YoY)8.4%-2.9%
Net income-$2.97B(TTM)$3.28B(TTM)
Earnings growth (YoY)23.2%-46.1%
EPS, diluted$-2.26(TTM)$0.91(TTM)
EBIT margin-66.5%4.6%
ROE-61.8%4.3%
ROIC-52.4%4.3%
Piotroski F—5/9
1y total return+1.1%-15.0%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: RIVN vs TSLA

$10.0K$1.3K$11.2K2021-11-102026-11-03
MetricRIVNTSLA
End value$1.3K$11.2K
Total return-86.8%+11.9%
CAGR-33.4%+2.3%
Volatility76.3%59.4%
Sharpe-0.210.26
Sortino-0.310.38
Max drawdown-95.1%-73.0%

Based on 1250 common trading days, 2021-11-10 → 2026-11-03 · risk-free 4.21% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

TSLA vs NVDARIVN vs LCIDLCID vs TSLAF vs TSLAGM vs TSLAF vs RIVN

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)