Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/Compare

TER vs SERV

TER and SERV side by side — valuation & fundamentals (public data).

Key statistics

TER vs SERV key statistics
MetricTERTERADYNE, INC.SERVServe Robotics Inc.
Market cap$42.13B$230.21M
P/E (TTM)31.0—
P/B11.42—
P/S13.2x87.8x
Dividend yield0.18%—
Revenue$5.00B(TTM)—
Revenue growth (YoY)13.1%46.2%
Net income$1.37B(TTM)—
Earnings growth (YoY)2.2%-158.6%
EPS, diluted$8.70(TTM)—
EBIT margin20.4%-4253.8%
ROE15.0%-28.8%
ROIC15.9%—
Piotroski F6/9—
1y total return+49.1%-79.7%

Figures from SEC filings · for reference only · not investment advice

Growth of $10,000: TER vs SERV

$10.0K$27.1K$8.6K2024-04-182026-11-02
MetricTERSERV
End value$27.1K$8.6K
Total return+171.4%-14.3%
CAGR+48.1%-5.9%
Volatility64.1%168.0%
Sharpe0.870.55
Sortino1.281.22
Max drawdown-58.2%-88.7%

Based on 638 common trading days, 2024-04-18 → 2026-11-02 · risk-free 4.16% (current short-Treasury, held constant)

A head-to-head total-return backtest over real split- and dividend-adjusted prices: how a one-time $10,000 investment in each stock, held to today, would have grown over their common window — including reinvested dividends. A disclosed historical statistic — NOT a prediction, a guarantee, or investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results.

Related comparisons

AAPL vs MSFTGOOGL vs METAAMZN vs GOOGLMSFT vs GOOGLMETA vs NFLXORCL vs MSFT

Delayed data · Public sources · For reference only · Not investment advice (this page declares no winner)