ACRV — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ACRV's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +33 | −47 | ~14 | 53 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
We are a clinical-stage biotechnology company discovering and developing precision medicines utilizing our proprietary Acrivon Predictive Precision Proteomics, or AP3, platform. The AP3 platform is driven by Generative Phosphoproteomics which is designed to allow us to quantify the global, drug-regu…
By applying our highly specific patient selection approach, and other AP3 applications, to drug development, we seek to both accelerate clinical development and significantly increase the probability of successful treatment outcomes for patients. Our pipeline includes our Phase 2b lead program, ACR-…
While Lilly had explored ACR-368 in many solid tumor types in the above-mentioned studies, they never tested endometrial cancer, or EC. Using our AP3 platform we generated a protein-based tumor biopsy test, called OncoSignature, designed to prospectively predict treatment benefit of ACR-368 at an in…
Based on interim clinical data from the ACR-368-201 trial, we found that the ORR in Arm 1 or EC was 39%, and 44% in patients treated with ≤2 prior lines of therapy, or pLoT. Across pooled BM+ and OncoSignature-negative, or BM-, subjects with serous EC, ≤2 pLoT showed a confirmed ORR of 52%. Serous E…
We have previously confirmed in preclinical studies that ULDG sensitizes both BM- and BM+ tumors to ACR-368, as predicted by the AP3 platform, and this is consistent with an upregulation of the ACR-368 OncoSignature biomarkers in both human tumor cell lines and in human tumor xenograft mouse models …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
We are a clinical stage biotechnology company discovering and developing precision medicines utilizing our proprietary Generative Phosphoproteomics Acrivon Predictive Precision Proteomics, or AP3, platform designed to interpret and quantify compound specific, drug-regulated pathway activity levels i…
We are currently focused on oncology and advancing our pipeline of preclinical and clinical-stage small molecule inhibitors. ACR-368 (also known as prexasertib), which is a selective small molecule inhibitor targeting CHK1 and partially CHK2, is in a potentially registrational Phase 2 trial focusing…
The ACR-368 registrational-intent multi-center Phase 2B trial is based on OncoSignature-predicted sensitivity to ACR-368 in endometrial cancer patients, a tumor type predicted to be sensitive to ACR-368 through preclinical AP3-based indication finding, and not previously evaluated in past clinical t…
In May 2023, ACR-368 was granted Fast Track designation from the FDA for the investigation of ACR-368 monotherapy for patients with OncoSignature-positive, or BM+, endometrial cancer. In January 2025, the ACR-368 OncoSignature test was granted Breakthrough Device Designation for the identification o…
At ESMO 2024 (September 14, 2024 R&D event and press release), we reported that endometrial cancer was our prioritized indication, as it represents the first potential registrational opportunity for ACR-368. We remain confident in this strategy based on emerging clinical data, competitive positionin…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
As of the date of this Quarterly Report, none of our directors or executive officers maintains an active Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-13
During the three months ended September 30, 2025, none of our directors or Section 16 reporting officers entered into, modified or terminated any “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement,” as such terms are defined in Item 408 of the SEC's Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice