ACTG — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ACTG's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +56 | −71 | ~36 | 53 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −2 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
We adhere closely to our philosophy of building strong and like-minded relationships with business leaders and, importantly, finding opportunities to make our return owning a business, rather through selling a business.
We run several different valuation models and metrics when we evaluate a business. One metric we rely heavily on is the durability and scalability of a target’s annual earnings stream, rather than its ‘exit year’ earnings, and the impact of these earnings on our income statement. Specifically, we un…
It is distinct from the ‘leveraged buyout model’ where the purchase price is heavily financed with a credit package, enabling small enhancements to earnings, and potential valuation multiple expansion, to generate returns. Both models work, as private equity has shown; however, in the private equity…
When we acquire a business at a ‘good multiple’, it means that we believe we are acquiring an attractive earnings stream relative to the price we paid to acquire that business, and that we believe there is an inherent valuation benefit relative to where similarly situated assets might trade in the m…
As part of our operating philosophy, we endeavor, through our strong network of operating partners, to enhance the values of businesses we acquire, driving both the ability to generate incremental earnings and potentially enhancing a company’s valuation multiple. Our focus is companies with a total …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
Our focus is companies with a total enterprise value of $1 billion or less. However, we may pursue larger acquisitions under the right circumstances. Broadly speaking, our potential acquisition targets are founder-owned or privately controlled businesses, entire public companies or carve-outs of spe…
Our strategic relationship with Starboard enhances our access to operating partners and industry experts with whom we evaluate potential acquisition opportunities, which enhances the oversight and value creation of our businesses. Starboard has provided, and we expect will continue to provide, ready…
technology; our Stingray IP Solutions portfolio, which covers wireless networking; and our R2 Solutions portfolio, which covers internet search, advertising and cloud computing technology.
We have established a proven track record of licensing and enforcement success with over 1,600 license agreements executed as of September 30, 2025, across nearly 200 patent portfolio licensing and enforcement programs. As of September 30, 2025, we have generated gross licensing revenue of approxima…
On April 17, 2024, Benchmark consummated the Revolution Transaction contemplated in the Revolution Purchase Agreement. Pursuant to the Revolution Purchase Agreement, Benchmark acquired certain upstream assets and related facilities in Texas and Oklahoma, including approximately 140,000 net acres and…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as of March 31, 2026, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that as a result of the material weakness and control deficiencies as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, our disclosure controls and procedures were not e…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-06
The information set forth below is included for the purpose of providing disclosure under “Item 1.01 — Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement” of Form 8-K.
On November 3, 2025, BE Anadarko II, LLC, a subsidiary of Benchmark, entered into a Second Amendment to the original Benchmark Loan Agreement (“Second Amendment”) with Frost Bank and the Benchmark Lenders. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, the Benchmark Revolving Credit Facility has been amended to …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice