AHR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AHR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-08
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +6 | −6 | ~38 | 28 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~8 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~3 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-07
Comparison of Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2026 and 2025
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, general and administrative expenses increased $4,948,000 and $9,398,000, respectively, primarily due to an increase in stock compensation expense of $2,577,000 and $4,884,000, respectively,…
For the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, depreciation and amortization was $72,125,000 and $41,941,000, respectively, which primarily consisted of depreciation on our operating properties of $46,601,000 and $37,284,000, respectively, and amortization of our identified intangible assets of …
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2025, depreciation and amortization increased by $30,184,000 and $56,132,000, respectively, primarily attributable to an increase of $20,904,000 and $38,673,000, respectively, in the amortization…
As we continued to evaluate our properties based on their historical operating performance and our expected holding period, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026, we recognized an aggregate impairment charge of $1,719,000 and $2,137,000, respectively for one and two OM buildings, respecti…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-08
For the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, depreciation and amortization was $67,062,000 and $41,114,000, respectively, which primarily consisted of depreciation on our operating properties of $44,756,000 and $36,577,000, respectively, and amortization of our identified intangible assets of…
As we continued to evaluate our properties based on their historical operating performance and our expected holding period, for the three months ended March 31, 2026, we recognized an impairment charge of $418,000 for one OM building. For the three months ended March 31, 2025, we determined that one…
included in net income (loss); gains or losses included in net income (loss) from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan; and after adjustments for consolidate…
Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — consolidated properties
Depreciation and amortization related to real estate — unconsolidated entities
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice