ALZN — what changed in the latest 10-K
A section-by-section comparison of ALZN's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-K · 2026-07-22 vs the prior 10-K · 2025-07-22
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business | Text added/removed | +17 | −3 | ~46 | 115 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | +15 | −22 | ~32 | 229 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +28 | −38 | ~17 | 39 |
| Market risk (Item 7A) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
Business
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-07-22
·Bioequivalence Confirmed: AL001 delivered 101% of total lithium blood exposure and 97% of peak lithium levels vs. standard lithium carbonate;
·Superior Brain Penetration: AL001 showed numerically higher lithium concentrations in all measured brain regions, including whole brain; and
·Faster Brain Uptake: AL001 reached peak brain concentration in 6.7 hours vs. 8.4 hours for standard lithium carbonate.
In April 2026, we announced pharmacodynamic topline data of the healthy human subjects with the following results:
·Potentially Distinct Brain Profile: Across multiple brain regions, AL001 and lithium carbonate appeared to trend in opposite directions in brain chemistry measures, suggesting that AL001 may interact with the brain in a distinct manner and generate a lower neurochemical footprint than lithium carbo…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-07-22
•Advance clinical development of ALZN002 for Alzheimer’s treatment. We submitted an IND application to the FDA in September 2022, and received a “study may proceed” letter in October 2022. In April 2023, we announced the initiation of a Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderat…
We expect to present topline data from this study by the end of 2025. Following completion of this clinical trial, we intend to initiate four more identical clinical trials, with the first of these trials, for treatment of patients with BD, expected to commence in the third quarter of 2025. We antic…
The other product candidate that we have obtained a license to clinically develop in humans is ALZN002, a patented method using a mutant peptide sensitized cell as a cell-based therapeutic vaccine which seeks to restore the ability of the patient’s immunological system to combat Alzheimer’s. The pro…
Risk factors
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-07-22
We rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical and clinical studies and perform other tasks for us. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or comply with regulatory requirements, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for…
We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party CROs to monitor and manage data and provide other services for our ongoing preclinical and clinical programs. We rely on these parties for execution of our preclinical and clinical studies, and control only certain aspects of their ac…
If any of our relationships with these third-party CROs terminate, we may not be able to enter into arrangements with alternative CROs or to do so on commercially reasonable terms. For example, in February 2024, Biorasi, our CRO for our Phase I/IIA clinical trial for ALZN002 to treat mild to moderat…
In addition, our CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available to us under our agreements with such CROs, we cannot control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our ongoing clinical and nonclinical programs. If CROs do not successfully carry out their contractu…
Switching or adding additional CROs involves additional cost and delays, which can materially influence our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. There can be no assurance that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges w…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-07-22
We have a limited operating history on which to judge our business prospects and management.
We were incorporated in February 2016 and commenced operations shortly thereafter. We have a limited operating history upon which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. Operating results for future periods are subject to numerous uncertainties and we cannot assure you that we will achi…
Members of the Board of Directors and executive officers of our company and Hyperscale Data, Inc. (“HDI”), contain some of the same individuals, which may present potential conflicts of interest.
Milton C. (Todd) Ault III, our Founder, and Vice Chairman, has significant influence over our Company, directly and indirectly through his controlling equity interest in Ault & Company, Inc. (“Ault & Co.”), the parent of Ault Life Sciences, Inc. (“ALSI”) and Ault Life Sciences Fund, LLC (“ALSF”). Mr…
While we believe that our business and technologies are distinguishable from those of HDI and that we do not compete in the markets in which HDI competes, Mr. Ault and the other named individuals may have potential conflicts of interest with respect to, among other things, potential corporate opport…
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2026-07-22
Based on the results from our Phase IIA MAD study, we plan to initiate five clinical trials to determine relative increased lithium levels in the brain compared to a marketed lithium salt for healthy subject and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD, based on publish…
In August 2024, we announced a partnership with MGH and Harvard Medical School to conduct five Phase II imaging clinical trials. The purpose of these trials is to assess the comparative increase in lithium levels within the brain and its structures as opposed to a commonly marketed lithium salt amon…
In November 2024, we announced a full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. This study was a precursor to the five clinical trials and showed that AL001 exhibited consistently higher lithium …
For these clinical trials, we partnered with Tesla Dynamic Coils BV to create a head coil to enable whole-brain imaging of lithium with remarkable resolution, allowing precise quantification within brain structures. The coil will be used to help identify the disease-specific target doses of AL001 th…
In May 2025, we announced the initiation, enrollment and dosing of the first patient for the healthy human patients. This clinical trial has the following objectives:
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-K · 2025-07-22
We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (the “JOBS Act”). Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards issued subsequent to the enactment of the JOBS Act, until such time as those standar…
Lithium is a commonly prescribed drug for manic episodes in BD type 1 as well as maintenance therapy of BD in patients with a history of manic episodes. Lithium is also prescribed off-label for MDD, BD and treatment of PTSD, among other disorders. Lithium was the first mood stabilizer approved by th…
Based on the results from our Phase IIA MAD study, we plan to initiate five clinical trials to determine relative increased lithium levels in the brain compared to a marketed lithium salt for healthy subject and patients diagnosed with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s, BD, MDD and PTSD, based on publish…
On November 19, 2024, we announced a final full data set from a nonclinical study comparing brain and plasma lithium exposures between AL001 and lithium carbonate in Alzheimer’s transgenic mice. The study was conducted at the University of South Florida and the bioanalytical procedures for determina…
Based on the study, both treatments had no negative impact on the mice's body weight or clinical signs during the treatment period. AL001 showed lower plasma lithium levels than lithium carbonate, reducing the risk of adverse systemic effects, suggesting an expansion for safety of lithium’s therapeu…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice