AMOD — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AMOD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-14
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +11 | −6 | ~5 | 20 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 0 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 23 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
Alpha Modus had total other income of $411,150 for the three months ended June 30, 2026, compared to total other expense of $1,638,252 for the three months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to a decrease of $81,396 in interest expense, no loss in loss on settlement of debt (for the…
For the Six Months ended June 30, 2026, compared to the Six Months ended June 30, 2025
Alpha Modus had $0 and $0 revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively.
Alpha Modus had operating expenses of $6,367,356 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to $2,508,011 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to an increase in professional fees, payroll expenses and increased costs of the kiosk system in development.
Alpha Modus had total other income of $197,465 for the six months ended June 30, 2026, compared to total other expense of $587,132 for the six months ended June 30, 2025. The increase was primarily due to patent infringement income of $325,000, an increase of $1,480,777 in change in fair value of wa…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
Alpha Modus had total other expense of $213,685 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to total other income of $1,051,120 for the three months ended March 31, 2025. The decrease was primarily due to the patent infringement income of $325,000, an increase of $368,322 in interest expense…
As of March 31, 2026, Alpha Modus had cash of $35,508. We do not have sufficient resources to execute all of our business plans. We expect to incur significant expenses during the next twelve months of operations, including expenses associated with being a public company. We estimate that these expe…
Net cash used in operating activities was $1,488,596 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to $594,147 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
We had net cash used in investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2026, of $119,797, compared to $0 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
We had net cash provided by financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2026, of $1,575,901, compared to $6,610 for the three months ended March 31, 2025.
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, to the Company’s knowledge, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f)) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5–1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5–1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-14
During the three months ended March 31, 2026, none of our directors or officers (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 16a-1(f)) adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5–1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5–1 trading arrangement,” each as defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K, except that each of the 10b5…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice