AMP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AMP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-10-31
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +40 | −124 | ~62 | 85 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | 0 | ~12 | 10 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
Management and financial advice fees increased $342 million, or 13%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period reflecting market appreciation, continued wrap account net inflows and a higher average advisory fee rate, partially offset by the cumulative impact of Ass…
Distribution fees increased $41 million, or 8%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period primarily due to higher transactional activity and market appreciation.
Premiums, policy and contract charges decreased $19 million, or 5%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period primarily due to lower sales of life contingent payout annuities and lower contract charges from lower guaranteed living benefit volumes.
Other revenues increased $37 million, or 29%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period primarily reflecting a $28 million benefit from the termination of the Comerica Bank relationship.
Banking and deposit interest expense decreased $53 million, or 42%, for the three months ended March 31, 2026 compared to the prior year period primarily reflecting lower balances and lower average crediting rates on certificates and lower average crediting rates on Ameriprise Bank, FSB (“Ameriprise…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-10-31
In the third quarter, we conducted our annual review of life insurance, annuity and long term care (“LTC”) valuation assumptions relative to current experience and management expectations including modeling changes. These annual assumption updates, including model changes, are collectively referred …
discontinued operations; and the impact of consolidating CIEs, best reflect the underlying performance of our core operations and facilitate a more meaningful trend analysis.
•The favorable impact of unlocking was $22 million for the three months ended September 30, 2025 compared to an unfavorable impact of $77 million for the prior year period.
The following table presents the total pretax impacts on our revenues and expenses attributable to unlocking for the three months ended September 30:
Remeasurement (gains) losses of future policy benefit reserves:
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
options, swaptions, swaps and futures to manage risk exposures. The exposures are measured and monitored daily, and adjustments to the hedge portfolio are made as necessary.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice