AMTX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of AMTX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-05-07 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-11-07
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +17 | −35 | ~17 | 18 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +2 | −2 | 0 | 1 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Legal proceedings, Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
California Ethanol. For the three months ended March 31, 2026, this segment generated 70% of its revenue from sales of ethanol, and the rest from sales of WDG, Corn Oil, CDS, and CO₂. It also generated and recognized $2.6 million in Section 45Z PTC income during the three months ended March 31, 2026…
California Dairy Renewable Natural Gas. During the three months ended March 31, 2026, we sold 109.5 thousand MMBtu ("million British thermal units") of RNG at an average price of 1.98 per MMBtu, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2025, when we sold 70.9 thousand MMBtu of RNG at an average …
India Biodiesel. The increase in cost of goods sold during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to March 31, 2025, was attributable to an increase in biodiesel sales.
California Ethanol. The gross profit during the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to a gross loss during the same period in 2025, was attributable primarily to reduced volumes and reduced corn costs, as well as the $2.6 million of Section 45Z PTC income recognized during the three months e…
California Dairy Renewable Natural Gas. The increase in gross profit for the three months ended March 31, 2026, compared to the same period in 2025, is due to the increase in RNG production and associated environmental attributes, as well as the $1.4 million of Section 45Z PTC income recognized duri…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
California Ethanol. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, this segment generated 77% of its revenue from sales of ethanol, and the rest from sales of WDG, Corn Oil, CDS, and CO₂. For the three months ended September 30, 2025, the Keyes Plant sold 14.7 million gallons of ethanol at an averag…
California Dairy Renewable Natural Gas. During the three months ended September 30, 2025, we sold 114.0 thousand MMBtu ("million British thermal units") of RNG at an average price of $3.45 per MMBtu, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2024, when we sold 86.0 thousand MMBtu of RNG at an…
India Biodiesel. The decrease in cost of goods sold during the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to September 30, 2024, was attributable to reduced biodiesel sales resulting in a 52% decrease in tons of feedstock used, offset by a 7% cost increase in feedstock used.
California Ethanol. The decrease in gross profit during the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, was attributable primarily to decreases in volumes by 5% and 10% for ethanol and WDG respectively, coupled with a decrease of 10% in the average sales price of WDG,…
California Dairy Renewable Natural Gas. The decrease in gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2025, compared to the same period in 2024, is due to the increase in costs of goods sold for the increased number of operating digesters.
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-07
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10‑Q, the Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defin…
There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended March 31, 2026, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-11-07
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange A…
As discussed in greater detail under Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024, we are executing our remediation plans to address the material weaknesses in our internal controls related to information technology general controls and inf…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice