ANKM — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ANKM's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-10-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-07-22
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +13 | −13 | ~4 | 14 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Market risk (Item 3), Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-10-14
Three months ended August 31, 2026 compared to August 31, 2025
During the three months ended August 31, 2026 and 2025, we have generated total revenue of $0 and $0, respectively. The Company had no revenue in both quarters as our operating activities experienced an overall slowdown and contraction.
Total operating expenses for the three months ended August 31, 2026 were $112,767 compared to $55,691 for the three months ended August 31, 2025. Our operating expenses consisted of general and administrative costs of $9,120 (three months ended August 31, 2025 - $71), director fees of $54,429 (three…
During the three months ended August 31, 2026 and 2025, we have generated Interest Income of $0 and $0, Debt Forgiveness of $0 and $31, and Exchange Gain or Loss of $3 and $8, respectively.
The net loss for the three months ended August 31, 2026, was $112,764, compared to net loss $60,551 for the three months ended August 31, 2025, due to the factors discussed above.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-22
During the three months ended May 31,2026,we generated revenue of $44,900. Total operating expenses were $98,357. The operating expenses included general and administrative expenses, director fees, professional fees, server expenses and amortization. Our net loss was $53,474.
During the three months ended May 31,2025 we generated revenue of $165,000. Total operating expenses were $46,313. The operating expenses included general and administrative expenses, server expenses, and amortization. Our net profit was $55,687.
During the six months ended May 31, 2026, we generated revenue of $44,900. Total operating expenses were $301,577. The operating expenses included general and administrative expenses, director fees, professional fees, server expenses, and amortization. Our net loss was $256,592.
During the six months ended May 31,2025, we generated revenue of $240,000. Total operating expenses were $91,894. The operating expenses included general and administrative expenses, professional fees, server expenses, and amortization. Our net profit was $45,106.
During the three months ended May 31, 2026 and May 31, 2025, we have generated total revenue of $44,900 and $165,000, respectively. The decrease in revenue for the quarter ended May 31, 2026 compared to the quarter ended May 31, 2025 was primarily due to a reduction in business volume, resulting in …
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice