ARMP — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ARMP's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-12 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +40 | −26 | ~30 | 46 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | −3 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-12
We are combining our proprietary approach and expertise in identifying, characterizing and developing both naturally occurring and engineered bacteriophages with our proprietary phage-specific host-engineered cGMP manufacturing capabilities to advance a clinical pipeline of high-quality bacteriophag…
that we are uniquely advancing two distinct clinical candidates, referred to as AP-PA02 and AP-SA02, targeting two different bacterial pathogens with the potential to treat chronic pulmonary disease complicated by bacterial infection as well as acute systemic bacterial infection. To date, we have co…
A statistically significant increase in clinical response rate was observed at TOC for AP-SA02 (day 12) in AP-SA02 treated subjects (88%; 21/24) versus placebo (58%; 7/12) (p = 0.047) as assessed by blinded site investigators, and 83% (20/24) in the AP-SA02 group versus 58% (7/12) in the placebo gro…
Of note, the complete clinical response with AP-SA02 occurred regardless of whether subjects were infected with Methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (“MSSA”) or MRSA. All subjects infected with MRSA and treated with AP-SA02 and BAT cleared their infection by TOC for BAT with no evidence of relapse throug…
Additionally, and consistent with the clinical response rate, patients treated with AP-SA02 showed trends toward rapid normalization of key predictors of mortality and complications in SAB including C-reactive protein and interleukin-10, shorter time to negative blood culture, quicker time to resolu…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
We are combining our proprietary approach and expertise in identifying, characterizing and developing both naturally occurring and engineered bacteriophages with our proprietary phage-specific host-engineered cGMP manufacturing capabilities to advance a clinical pipeline of high-quality bacteriophag…
placebo controlled clinical trials. We have combined our clinical data with rigorous and innovative in vitro science to extend our knowledge of phage biology enabling continued enhancement of in vivo phage function.
A statistically significant increase in clinical response rate was observed at TOC for AP-SA02 (day 12) in AP-SA02 treated subjects (88%; 21/24) versus placebo (58%; 7/12) (p = 0.047) as assessed by blinded site investigators, and 83% (20/24) in the AP-SA02 group versus 58% (7/12) in the placebo gro…
Additionally, and consistent with the clinical response rate, patients treated with AP-SA02 showed trends toward rapid normalization of key predictors of mortality and complications in SAB including C-reactive protein and interleukin-10, shorter time to negative blood culture, quicker time to resolu…
Clinical efficacy was observed independent of the BAT utilized, in that all patients responded despite receiving different classes of antibiotics. The active and placebo arms were well-matched for antibiotics utilized. The clinical response rate also occurred independent of the site of infection, wh…
Other information
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
On May 12, 2026, the Company entered into, as borrower, a credit and security agreement (the “May 2026 Credit Agreement”) with Innoviva Strategic Opportunities LLC (“Innoviva”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Innoviva, Inc., a principal shareholder of the Company. The May 2026 Credit Agreement provide…
The May 2026 Credit Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants and representations and warranties, including financial reporting obligations and certain limitations on indebtedness, liens, investments, distributions (including dividends), collateral, investments, mergers or acqu…
The foregoing description of the May 2026 Credit Agreement is qualified in its entirety by the full text of such document, which is filed as Exhibit 10.6 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and is incorporated herein by reference.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice