ARTW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ARTW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-07-15 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +4 | −4 | ~7 | 3 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-07-15
Our consolidated corporate sales from continuing operations for the three- and six-month periods ended May 31, 2026 were $7,854,000 and $14,494,000, respectively, compared to $6,337,000 and $11,478,000, respectively, during the same periods in fiscal 2025. Our sales increased $1,517,000, or 23.9% fo…
Sales in our Agricultural Products segment during the second quarter of fiscal 2026 were $4,374,000 compared to $4,026,000 during the same period of fiscal 2025, an increase of $348,000, or 8.6%. Sales for the six months ended May 31, 2026 were $8,128,000 compared to $6,973,000, an increase of $1,15…
Our second fiscal quarter sales in our Modular Buildings segment were $3,480,000 compared to $2,311,000 for the same period in fiscal 2025, an increase of $1,169,000, or 50.6%. Our sales for the six months ended May 31, 2026 were $6,366,000 compared to $4,505,000 for the same period of fiscal 2025, …
As of May 31, 2026, our revolving credit line (the "Line of Credit") had an outstanding principal balance of $3,495,438. We renewed our revolving line of credit with Bank Midwest on March 19, 2026, with a scheduled maturity date of March 30, 2027. In our most recent renewal, we negotiated an interes…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-13
Our consolidated corporate sales from continuing operations for the three- month period ended February 28, 2026 were $ 6,640,000 compared to $5,141,000 during the same period in fiscal 2025, an increase of $1,499,000, or 29.2%. Consolidated gross margin for the three months ended February 28, 2026 w…
Sales in our Agricultural Products segment during the first quarter of fiscal 2026 were $3,754,000 compared to $2,948,000 during the same period of fiscal 2025, an increase of $806,000, or 27.3%. We have experienced increased demand this quarter, as compared to the same period in 2025, with increase…
Our first fiscal quarter sales in our Modular Buildings segment were $2,886,000 compared to $2,193,000 for the same period in fiscal 2025, an increase of $693,000, or 31.6%. We carried strong modular building backlog into fiscal 2026, unlike a year ago, which drove the revenue increase this year. We…
As of February 28, 2026, our revolving credit line had an outstanding principal balance of $3,431,937. We renewed our revolving line of credit with Bank Midwest on March 19, 2026, with a scheduled maturity date of March 30, 2027. In our most recent renewal, we negotiated an interest rate 50 basis po…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice