ATNI — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of ATNI's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +124 | −65 | ~69 | 71 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10
On June 2, 2026 (the “Initial Closing Date”), we completed the initial closing of the Tower Portfolio Transaction (the “Initial Closing”), and we currently anticipate that we will complete the Tower Portfolio Transaction in one or more Subsequent Closings (as defined below) over the next eleven mont…
At the Initial Closing, Everest paid us $267.7 million in aggregate cash consideration (the “Initial Closing Cash Consideration”), of which $153.4 million is attributable to the Assigned Sites and $114.3 million is attributable to the Managed Sites. Of the Initial Closing Cash Consideration, $255.7 …
●We received approximately $5.5 million annually in the US Virgin Islands through December 31, 2025; and
expect to meet all requirements associated with these grants. As of June 30, 2026, we were awarded $100.9 million of construction grants that are pending completion.
During the six months ended June 30, 2026, we disbursed capital expenditures of $9.5 million under these programs and received reimbursement of $8.1 million. These cash flows are classified as investing activities in our statement of cash flows.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-11
The Tower Portfolio Transaction may be completed in one or more closings. The Transaction Agreement sets forth certain conditions that must be satisfied prior to the conveyance of tower sites at a closing. During the period between signing and the initial closing, the parties will determine which to…
At the initial closing, we will enter into, among other ancillary agreements, (i) a management agreement for
certain sites, (ii) master lease agreements, pursuant to which we will lease the requisite ground, tower, or other space of the conveyed tower site for our continued use, and (iii) a preferred backhaul agreement whereby we will become the preferred backhaul provider with respect to the conveyed towe…
The Transaction Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants, and indemnities by each of the parties, and requires the receipt of certain consents and approvals prior to a closing. The waiting period required under the Hart-Scott Rodino Act of 1976 with respect to the Tower Po…
We continue to expect the initial closing of the Tower Portfolio Transaction to occur in the second quarter of 2026 generating gross proceeds of approximately $250 million to $270 million. Subsequent closings, totaling approximately $27 million to $47 million, are anticipated to occur over the twelv…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice