Tickwind
TodayOpportunitiesMarketsAI Chat
EN
Log inSign up
Tickwind

Read every tick. See where the market's blowing.

  • X
  • TelegramChinese
  • Newsletter

Product

  • Markets
  • Theme Zones
  • All stocks
  • Compare
  • Hot stocks
  • Opportunities
  • News
  • Discussion
  • Watchlist
  • What's new

Account

  • Settings
  • Newsletter
  • For writers
  • MCP server
  • Contact
  • Log in
  • Sign up
MarketsTheme ZonesAll stocksCompareHot stocksOpportunitiesNewsDiscussionWatchlistWhat's newSettingsNewsletterFor writersMCP serverContactLog inSign up

© 2026 Tickwind. Not investment advice.

Made for the curious investor.

Home/AVD/Filing changes

AVD — what changed in the latest 10-Q

A section-by-section comparison of AVD's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.

Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-10 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-06

SectionOutcomeAddedRemovedMinorUnchanged
MD&AText added/removed+55−28~34
Market risk (Item 3)No paragraph-level changes0004
Controls & proceduresText added/removed00~11
Legal proceedingsNo paragraph-level changes0001
Risk factorsNo material changes reported (points to the 10-K)————

Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.

Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Other information

Representative excerpts

Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.

MD&A

Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-10

  • With prolonged pressure on the farm economy from higher fuel and fertilizer costs during the second quarter of 2026, distributors, retailers and growers continued to follow conservative procurement practices, buying goods closer to time-of-need and minimizing carrying costs which, in some cases (as …
  • Overall net sales during the quarter declined by 10% over the comparable period last year. This performance included decreases in net sales of both US Crop (down 9%, largely from a shift in sales of cotton products to the third quarter) and International business (down 18%, largely due to weather an…
  • While declining by 3% on an absolute basis quarter-over-quarter, operating expenses as a percentage of net sales increased to 30% from 28% in the same quarter of the prior year. Compared to the same period of the prior year, research, product development and regulatory expenses increased by 12%, sel…
  • Interest expense, net increased by $4,680 due to increased borrowing under the new debt structure (consisting of the First Lien Term Loan and Second Lien Term Loan), that was put into place on March 13, 2026, and the comparatively higher effective interest rate thereunder.
  • The Company recorded an income tax expense of $383 compared to $765 in the same period of last year. The decrease in income tax expense compared to the same period last year is primarily attributed to a reduction in the estimated effective tax rate for the full year for primarily the profitable enti…

Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-06

  • The Company’s financial performance during the quarter improved over the comparable period last year with net sales up 7%. This performance included US Crop sales that were up 17%, while Specialty net sales rose 6%, and International sales declined by 7%.
  • The global crop protection market improved during the first quarter of 2026. However, dynamic economic and political factors, such as sudden tariff shifts and unannounced military activity in international shipping lanes, along with high cost of capital, caused growers to remain somewhat cautious an…
  • In spite of constrained procurement practices within the distribution channel, the Company’s financial performance improved with respect to both sales and profitability. Increased sales of higher volume products along with flat cost of goods and continued efficiency of manufacturing operations gener…
  • Operating expenses increased by approximately 6% but remained flat when expressed as a percentage of net sales at 29.6% compared to 29.8% in the same quarter of the prior year. Within operating expenses, selling expenses were flat, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately 7%, a…
  • Interest expense rose by about $2,025 due to increased borrowing, primarily driven by the new loan agreements, and increased interest rates from the revolving line of credit that was retired, and by the two term loans that replaced it on March 13, 2026.

How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q

A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:

  • Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
  • Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
  • Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.

This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.

Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice

More on AVD

AVD overviewAVD quant ratingAVD fair value (DCF)AVD vs peersAVD revenue historyAVD AI deep research