BBW — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BBW's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-06-11 vs the prior 10-Q · 2025-12-11
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +39 | −38 | ~23 | 41 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 2 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | +5 | −1 | 0 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-11
● the uncertainty of the impact of tariffs on countries from which we import is expected to have an impact on our business, mainly our cost of goods and profit margin, including uncertainty regarding the ultimate availability, timing, and amount of any remaining refunds of IEEPA tariffs we previousl…
● our use of artificial intelligence technologies presents operational, reputational, data security and legal risks that could adversely affect our business and financial performance, and any failure to effectively leverage artificial technologies in our business could negatively impact our customer…
● because our business is largely based on a vertical retail model, labor-related matters, ranging from union formation to labor disputes, may adversely affect our operations; and
Build-A-Bear Workshop, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was formed in 1997 as a mall-based, experiential specialty retailer for children. Build‑A‑Bear has evolved to become a leading global "retailtainment" brand on a mission to add a little more heart to life. At Build-A-Bear, guests are invited to cr…
The Build-A-Bear brand has high consumer awareness and positive affinity, and we leverage our brand strength to expand the footprint of our retail experience locations through a range of store sizes, formats, and locations, including tourist destinations. In addition to growing our corporately-manag…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-11
● the uncertainty of the impact of tariffs on countries from which we import is expected to have an impact on our business, mainly our cost of goods and profit margin;
We were formed in 1997 as a mall-based, experiential specialty retailer. Build-A-Bear has since evolved to become a beloved multi-generational brand focused on its mission to “add a little more heart to life” where guests of all ages make their own “furry friends” in celebration and commemoration of…
We primarily operate through a vertical retail channel with corporately-managed, partner-operated, and franchise locations that feature a unique combination of experience and product in which guests can “make their own stuffed animals.” We also operate buildabear.com and buildaber.co.uk, which both …
Our strategy includes leveraging our brand strength to continue to evolve our brick-and-mortar retail footprint with a versatile range of formats and locations, including tourist destinations, expanding into international markets primarily via our partner-operated and franchise store models, and gro…
As of November 1, 2025, we had 375 corporately-managed stores globally, 168 partner-operated locations operating through our partner-operated model in which we sell our products on a wholesale basis to other companies that execute our retail experience, and 108 international franchised stores, all u…
Other information
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-06-11
Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K requires the Company to disclose whether any of its directors or officers have adopted or terminated (i) any trading arrangement that is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Rule 10b5-1(c); and/or (ii) any written trading arrangement that meets the …
•Voin Todorovic, Chief Financial Officer, adopted a new trading arrangement on April 2, 2026 providing for the sale of up to 12,000 aggregate shares of the Company’s Class A common stock between July 6, 2026, and January 29, 2027.
•Narayan Iyengar, Director, adopted a new trading arrangement on March 20, 2026 providing for the sale of up to 3,448 aggregate shares of the Company's Class A common stock between June 22, 2026, and February 26, 2027.
•Sharon John, Chief Executive Officer, adopted a new trading arrangement on March 19, 2026 providing for the sale of up to 91,036 aggregate shares of the company's Class A common stock between July 6, 2026, and September 2, 2026.
Each of the foregoing trading arrangements is intended to satisfy the affirmative defense of rule 10b5-1(c).
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2025-12-11
During the Company's fiscal quarter ended November 1, 2025, none of our directors or officers informed us of the adoption or termination of a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement”, as such terms are defined under Item 408(a) of Regulation S-K.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice