BCHT — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BCHT's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-13 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-13
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +9 | −10 | ~19 | 20 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Risk factors
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-13
In April 2024, the EPA issued the first-ever national, enforceable drinking water standard to protect communities from exposure to harmful PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals”, under the Safe Water Drinking Act. The rule as enacted established legally enforceable maximum contaminant levels (“MCLs…
On May 14, 2025, the EPA announced that it would retain the national drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS but intends to extend the compliance deadline for those contaminants from 2029 to 2031 and establish a federal exemption framework. The EPA also announced its intent to rescind the existin…
Between January and July 2025, certain defendants in the consolidated Iowa actions filed inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions challenging asserted claims of our patents. The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituted review of certain petitions, and in October 2025 the U.S. District Court for th…
With regard to the 2019 litigation, on December 29, 2025 and following resolution of post-trial motions, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware entered final judgment in favor of the Company in the amount of $78,397,157, inclusive of pre-judgment interest. On January 28, 2026, the defe…
Separately, in connection with the consolidated Iowa actions, the Company has entered into agreements with certain utilities and affiliated parties, the most recent of which became effective on May 28, 2026. These agreements resolved disputes with the applicable parties, granted licenses to certain …
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-13
On March 12, 2025, the newly appointed EPA administrator under the Trump Administration announced plans to roll back dozens of environmental regulations including the reconsideration of the MATS regulation. On April 8, 2025, President Trump signed a Proclamation exempting certain stationary sources,…
In April 2024, the EPA under the Biden Administration issued the first-ever national, enforceable drinking water standard to protect communities from exposure to harmful PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals”. The rule as enacted established legally enforceable MCLs (maximum contaminant levels) for…
On December 29, 2025, following resolution of post-trial motions, the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware entered final judgment in favor of the Company in the amount of $78,397,157, inclusive of pre-judgment interest, in connection with the patent infringement action commenced in 2019.…
Separately, the Company has entered into agreements with certain utilities resolving disputes and providing for licenses to certain of the Company’s patents and withdrawal of related proceedings. As a result, those parties have been dismissed from the applicable actions. Two utilities remain in the …
In addition, certain defendants have filed inter partes review (“IPR”) petitions challenging asserted claims of the Company’s patents. The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) instituted review of certain petitions, and proceedings are ongoing. The U.S. District Court for the Southern Distric…
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice