BEATWvs its industry peers
A metric-by-metric comparison of BEATW against SIC 3841 — valuation, growth, profitability, quality and total return, with each figure's rank within the peer group. Every value is Go-computed from SEC filings and delayed prices; ranks are sorted positions within the group only — descriptive, not advice.
| Company | Market cap | P/E (TTM) | P/B | P/S | Revenue growth (YoY) | Earnings growth (YoY) | EBIT margin | ROE | ROIC | Piotroski F | 1y total return | Dividend yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BEATWThis | $7M#1 | — | 11.4x#4 | — | — | -8.1%#4 | — | -3309.4%#4 | — | — | — | — |
| PFSA | $5M#2 | — | — | 47.1x#5 | — | -288.1%#5 | -27706.0%#5 | — | — | — | — | — |
| NXGL | $4M#3 | — | 1.0x#2 | 0.3x#2 | 31.5%#1 | 8.6%#2 | -29.3%#1 | -75.1%#2 | -84.6%#2 | 5#2 | — | — |
| TNON | $2M#4 | — | 1.2x#3 | 0.6x#3 | 20.4%#2 | 8.2%#3 | -324.3%#3 | -662.6%#3 | — | — | — | — |
| OSRHW | $2M#5 | 0.4x#2 | — | 0.7x#4 | -17.7%#4 | -697.1%#6 | -631.0%#4 | — | — | 0#3 | — | — |
| IVF | $2M#6 | 0.0x#1 | 0.1x#1 | 0.2x#1 | 4.7%#3 | 157.6%#1 | -105.8%#2 | 155.2%#1 | -48.4%#1 | 6#1 | — | — |
Peer set: US filers sharing this company's SEC industry classification (SIC 3841). SIC is coarse — conglomerates and multi-segment companies map imperfectly. Values from SEC filings + delayed prices; ranks are within-group positions only. Market cap, P/E, P/B, P/S, 1y total return and dividend yield are computed from each member's latest snapshot price when the table is built (see as-of; snapshot prices can lag) — not live. Some peers are still being computed, so this table covers part of the group and ranks are within the rows shown; it fills in shortly. This table timed out mid-build, so it covers part of the group; ranks are within the rows shown and it fills in shortly. Table built 2026-08-03.
Source: SEC XBRL filings + delayed prices · ranks are within-group positions · For reference only · Not investment advice