BGFR — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BGFR's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-19 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-04-22
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +9 | −6 | 0 | 0 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | +3 | −3 | 0 | 0 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
This Quarterly Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements involve risks and uncertainties.
BestGofer, Inc. operates through (i) a developmental BestGofer delivery platform (pre-operational) and (ii) home inspection services through its wholly-owned subsidiary LHIS. The Company is no longer a shell company.
Results of Operations - Three Months Ended May 31, 2026 vs Three Months Ended May 31, 2025.
Revenue. $4,776 vs $0. The Company recorded $0 customer revenue in March 2026 and $0 customer revenue in April 2026; all Q2 revenue was generated in May 2026 from four customer engagements (Grand Bay Resort, Deb Hiller, Steve Thompson, and David Rawes for inspections at two properties). The absence …
Cost of services and gross profit. Cost of services was $2,119, comprising contractor compensation of $1,800 paid to the LHIS sole inspector (a related party) and materials of $319, producing gross profit of $2,657. Operating expenses were $31,188, comprising professional fees of $31,168 and general…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-22
BestGofer, Inc. operates through two identified business segments: (i) the BestGofer delivery platform, which is pre-operational and has not generated revenue, and (ii) home inspection services conducted through its wholly-owned subsidiary LHIS, acquired August 31, 2025.
Results of Operations - Three Months Ended February 28, 2026 compared to February 28, 2025
Revenue. Revenue for Q1 FY2026 was $2,231, compared to $0 in the prior year period. Revenue was generated by the LHIS subsidiary from four customer transactions during the period.
Operating Expenses. Total operating expenses were $3,232, compared to $14,072 in the prior year period, a decrease of $10,840 or approximately 77%. The decrease reflects reduced general and administrative expenses in the current period. Operating expenses in Q1 FY2026 comprised G&A $9 (bank service …
As of February 28, 2026, the Company had cash of $1,924 and a working capital deficiency of approximately $(104,050). The Company has historically relied on financial support from its Director (Mohammad Hasan Hamed) for operating liquidity. The Company has advanced $3,500 during Q1 FY2026 to the for…
Controls & procedures
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-19
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer (Mohammad Hasan Hamed, serving in both capacities) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of May 31, 2026 and concluded that they we…
Material weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting (“ICFR”). The Company continues to have a material weakness arising from limited segregation of duties, reliance on external accounting service providers for the close cycle, and the absence of an independent audit committee.
Changes in ICFR. No changes during Q2 FY2026 that materially affected ICFR.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-04-22
The Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (the same individual), evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of February 28, 2026. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer …
The Company is implementing remediation efforts including (i) reconciling related-party balances with supporting documentation, (ii) engaging third-party consultants for XBRL and interim accounting support, and (iii) establishing formal sub-event review procedures. These efforts are ongoing; the Com…
Other than the remediation efforts described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during Q1 FY2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice