BHB — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BHB's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-05
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +26 | −15 | ~18 | 21 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | Text added/removed | +1 | −1 | ~6 | 9 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
Total loans increased $8.3 million to $3.6 billion in the second quarter 2026. Commercial real estate loans decreased $10.0 million primarily due to $130.6 million in maturities, payoffs and paydowns and was offset in part by originations of $120.6 million. Commercial and industrial loans increased …
The allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans was $32.2 million at the end of the second quarter 2026 compared to $34.1 million at the end of the fourth quarter 2025. The change in the allowance was primarily driven by a $3.3 million charge-off related to a previously disclosed non-accruing relat…
the second quarter 2026. The loan was previously reserved for and the charge-offs recorded reflect the Company's best estimate of the property's fair value based on underlying appraisal and market information.
Premises and equipment increased in the first half of 2026 to $61.2 million compared to $58.2 million at the end of the fourth quarter 2025 driven by renovation projects. Other real estate owned was $8.2 million at the end of the second quarter 2026 due to the aforementioned non-accruing loan, there…
Total deposits were $3.9 billion at the end of the second quarter 2026 compared to $3.8 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025. The increase was driven primarily by $73.8 million in new customer non-maturity deposits. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $7.3 million, interest-be…
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
Total loans decreased $20.6 million to $3.6 billion in the first quarter 2026 compared to the fourth quarter 2025 driven primarily by commercial real estate payoffs. Commercial real estate loans decreased $30.2 million primarily due to one early payoff of $14.4 million and $24.4 million in loans tha…
The allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) on loans remained stable at $34.3 million at the end of the first quarter 2026 compared to $34.1 million at the end of the fourth quarter 2025. The activity in the ACL is reflective of loan portfolio
changes and credit quality indicators. The allowance for credit losses to total loans coverage ratio for the first quarter 2026 was in line with the fourth quarter 2025 at 0.96% versus 0.94%.
Premises and equipment increased in the first quarter 2026 to $58.9 million compared to $58.2 million at the end of the fourth quarter 2025 driven by renovation projects. Bank owned life insurance decreased $6.4 million or 7% driven by death benefit pay outs that occurred at the end of the first qua…
Total deposits were $3.9 billion at the end of the first quarter 2026 compared to $3.8 billion at the end of the fourth quarter of 2025. The increase was driven primarily by $17.2 million in new customer non-maturity deposits. Non-interest bearing demand deposits decreased $19.5 million and was offs…
Market risk (Item 3)
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-05
As compared to June 30, 2025, asset sensitivity has increased in both year one and year two.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-05
As compared to March 31, 2025, asset sensitivity in year one is higher in up rate scenarios but slightly lower in down rate scenarios, while in year two, sensitives are higher in both up and down rate scenarios.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice