BICX — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BICX's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-08-14 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-05-15
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +23 | −11 | ~16 | 33 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Legal proceedings | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 3 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Risk factors, Other information
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-14
On March 13, 2026, the Company entered into a fifth amendment agreement to a promissory note, which was originally issued to a third party on March 14, 2024. In accordance with the amendment, the parties agreed to modify the maturity date of the note from February 28, 2026 to September 30, 2026. The…
As of June 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company owed $307,249 and $312,249 advances to Lourdes Felix, respectively. During the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025, the Company also recognized imputed interest of $7,672 and $8,245, respectively, for advances from Lourdes Felix based on a…
On May 21, 2026, Joseph Galligan, a member of the Board of Directors, entered into a Subscription Agreement (the “2026 Q2 Subscription Agreement”) to purchase a total of 375,000 shares of common stock for a total purchase price of $150,000.
Since 2026, the Company had received an aggregate of $200,904 advances from Mr. Lucido. On February 15, 2026, the Company issued 294,118 shares of its common stock at $0.34 per share in connection with conversion of the related party promissory note then outstanding of $100,000. As the fair value of…
Interest expense - related parties for the three months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 were $138,597 and $164,371, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to the paid off the related party notes payable in 2025.
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-05-15
The Company has entered into multiple amendments to a promissory note, which was originally issued to a third party on December 8, 2023. After those amendments, the promissory note has a principal of $330,000, bears interest at 5% per annum, matures on March 31, 2026, and is convertible into common …
As of March 31, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the Company owed $307,249 and $312,249 advances to Lourdes Felix, respectively. During the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025, the Company also recognized imputed interest of $9,969 and $3,840 for advances from Lourdes Felix based on an imputed int…
Since 2026, the Company had received an aggregate of $85,904 advances from Mr. Lucido. On February 15, 2026, the Company issued 294,118 shares of its common stock at $0.34 per share in connection with conversion of the related party promissory note then outstanding of $100,000. As the fair value of …
The reasons for the increase in 2026 are primarily due to (i) an increase of $190,414 in research and development expense from $161,919 for the three months ended March 31, 2025 to $352,333 for the three months ended March 31, 2026, (ii) an increase of $58,903 in consulting expense, from $140,929 fo…
Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2026 and 2025 were $31,041 and $87,483, respectively. The decrease was mainly due to the full amortization of certain debt discounts before 2026.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice