BKH — what changed in the latest 10-Q
A section-by-section comparison of BKH's newest periodic SEC filing (10-K/10-Q) against the prior same-form filing: paragraphs added and removed per section, with verbatim excerpts. Purely a deterministic text diff — no similarity scores, no directional read, not investment advice.
Comparing 10-Q · 2026-11-05 vs the prior 10-Q · 2026-08-06
| Section | Outcome | Added | Removed | Minor | Unchanged |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MD&A | Text added/removed | +44 | −33 | ~33 | 50 |
| Market risk (Item 3) | No paragraph-level changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Controls & procedures | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~2 | 1 |
| Risk factors | No material changes reported (points to the 10-K) | — | — | — | — |
| Other information | Text added/removed | 0 | 0 | ~1 | 0 |
Counts are paragraphs; added/removed means text added or removed vs the prior filing — no direction or judgement implied.
Not shown (absent or not faithfully extractable): Legal proceedings
Representative excerpts
Up to 5 excerpts of about 300 characters per section, quoted verbatim from the two SEC filings.
MD&A
Text added vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-11-05
In September 2026, the Company entered into long-term agreements with Google and other third-party partners to serve a planned data center project to be constructed in Cheyenne, Wyoming. The project is contracted to be served through a total resource mix of 2.7 GW, including reserve margins, and is …
To provide 590 MW of grid-connected service, the Company expects to invest approximately $1.8 billion to construct 564 MW (nameplate capacity) of new company-owned natural gas generation between 2027 and 2029 through a non-regulated affiliate, which will be located at the Company's existing CPGS fac…
The Company expects to finance the approximately $1.8 billion of generation investment through a combination of project-generated cash flow and debt and equity instruments with a focus on earnings accretion while maintaining solid investment-grade credit ratings. In connection with the development o…
The agreements include contractual protections throughout the 2048 contract term intended to prevent cost shifting to existing retail customers, including:
Cost pass-through mechanisms – protect customers from costs associated with the planned data center while protecting returns from inflation, interest rate volatility, and other cost pressures;
Text removed vs the prior filing · source: 10-Q · 2026-08-06
During the second quarter of 2026, South Dakota Electric continued with construction of its Lange II project which is anticipated to be in service in the fourth quarter of 2026. The addition of these resources will replace generation facilities planned for retirement and support updated planning res…
On April 22, 2026, Wyoming Electric entered into a generation reservation agreement with a prospective new customer seeking to construct a 1.8 GW data center under Wyoming Electric's LPCS Tariff. In July 2026, the parties amended this generation reservation agreement to increase the total refundable…
On June 30, 2026, Wyoming Electric submitted an IRP to the WPSC. The IRP, which is based on 20-year planning period including a near-term planning period through 2033, identified a near-term capacity shortfall of 95 MW beginning in 2027. Based on its forecasts and analysis, Wyoming Electric recommen…
On June 19, 2026, Wyoming Electric filed a request with the WPSC to establish an LCTCAM tariff. The LCTCAM tariff provides a framework to directly recover transmission investment costs from LPCS customers who are served by, and benefit from, the transmission facility. The proposed mechanism is desig…
In 2026, Wyoming Electric has set multiple all-time records for System Peak Demand. The most recent all-time peak of 439 MW was set on July 20, 2026. Prior to 2026, the previous all-time peak was 379 MW set on June 20, 2025.
How to read Risk Factors (Item 1A) in a 10-Q
A 10-Q risk-factor section usually takes one of three forms; this page classifies it as one of:
- Pointer — the filer states there have been no material changes and points back to the annual 10-K risk factors; there is no own risk text to compare this quarter.
- Partial update — the filer carves out specific updated risks ("except as set forth below"); the excerpts show exactly what is new this quarter.
- Restated in full — the quarter carries the complete risk-factor text. When the prior quarter was only a pointer there is no prior full text to diff against, so the page flags the section as restated instead.
This describes the filing structure only — it is never a judgement on whether risk went up or down.
Source: text-level diff of the two SEC EDGAR filings · deterministic (no AI-generated content) · for reference only · not investment advice